At a Crossroad: Comparing ChatGPT and Grammarly in Enhancing EFL Learners’ Use of the Article 'The'

The present study investigated the effectiveness of ChatGPT and Grammarly as automated writing evaluation (AWE) tools in improving Iranian EFL learners’ use of the article ‘the’. As such, we selected 60 intermediate learners and divided them into three groups including two experimental groups that received ChatGPT and Grammarly feedbacks and a control group that was given teacher feedback. A pretest and a posttest were administered before and after the Intervention. After we ran a one-way ANOVA, the results indicated a statistically significant difference among the groups, with the Grammarly group performing significantly better than the control group, though not significantly better than the ChatGPT group. Additionally, qualitative findings from semi-structured interviews revealed that the participants had positive perceptions of using the tools for bridging the gap between instruction and practice, providing immediate feedback, and enhancing motivation and engagement. However, they reported limitations such as limited availability, dependency, potential for plagiarism, and the need for digital literacy. These findings underscore the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, specifically Grammarly as a supplementary aid in EFL contexts, particularly for helping learners improve their grammatical accuracy.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-08-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29804789
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

At a Crossroad: Comparing ChatGPT and Grammarly in Enhancing EFL Learners’ Use of the Article 'The'

Figshare
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

At a Crossroad: Comparing ChatGPT and Grammarly in Enhancing EFL Learners’ Use of the Article 'The'

article en

Abstract

The present study investigated the effectiveness of ChatGPT and Grammarly as automated writing evaluation (AWE) tools in improving Iranian EFL learners’ use of the article ‘the’. As such, we selected 60 intermediate learners and divided them into three groups including two experimental groups that received ChatGPT and Grammarly feedbacks and a control group that was given teacher feedback. A pretest and a posttest were administered before and after the Intervention. After we ran a one-way ANOVA, the results indicated a statistically significant difference among the groups, with the Grammarly group performing significantly better than the control group, though not significantly better than the ChatGPT group. Additionally, qualitative findings from semi-structured interviews revealed that the participants had positive perceptions of using the tools for bridging the gap between instruction and practice, providing immediate feedback, and enhancing motivation and engagement. However, they reported limitations such as limited availability, dependency, potential for plagiarism, and the need for digital literacy. These findings underscore the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, specifically Grammarly as a supplementary aid in EFL contexts, particularly for helping learners improve their grammatical accuracy.

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

At a Crossroad: Comparing ChatGPT and Grammarly in Enhancing EFL Learners’ Use of the Article 'The' · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS