Appendix.pdf

For over four decades, comparative analyses of Thai and Chinese idioms have been conducted, yet a significant gap persists in the examination of idiomatic expressions specific to southern Thai dialects juxtaposed with Chinese equivalents. This study aims to address this gap by scrutinizing the structural and functional parallels and disparities between southern Thai idioms and Chinese idioms. This study curated a corpus of 47 southern Thai idioms incorporating the term /kin/ which had the same meaning as the English word eat, which were then contrasted with 57 Chinese idioms conveying similar meanings. Findings from this comparative analysis underscore the divergent idiomatic conventions inherent in both languages. Moreover, the study elucidates how idiomatic expressions, while bearing equivalent semantic content, may be employed within distinct sociocultural contexts owing to the inherent cultural disparities between the two linguistic traditions. Notably, the idiomatic repertoire of southern Thai dialects exhibits distinct features deviating from those observed in central Thai idioms, which have historically served as the benchmark for comparative investigations in prior academic.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27923526
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appendix.pdf

Figshare
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
article

Appendix.pdf

article en

Abstract

For over four decades, comparative analyses of Thai and Chinese idioms have been conducted, yet a significant gap persists in the examination of idiomatic expressions specific to southern Thai dialects juxtaposed with Chinese equivalents. This study aims to address this gap by scrutinizing the structural and functional parallels and disparities between southern Thai idioms and Chinese idioms. This study curated a corpus of 47 southern Thai idioms incorporating the term /kin/ which had the same meaning as the English word eat, which were then contrasted with 57 Chinese idioms conveying similar meanings. Findings from this comparative analysis underscore the divergent idiomatic conventions inherent in both languages. Moreover, the study elucidates how idiomatic expressions, while bearing equivalent semantic content, may be employed within distinct sociocultural contexts owing to the inherent cultural disparities between the two linguistic traditions. Notably, the idiomatic repertoire of southern Thai dialects exhibits distinct features deviating from those observed in central Thai idioms, which have historically served as the benchmark for comparative investigations in prior academic.

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Appendix.pdf · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS