THE ORIGINAL VERSUS TRANSLATIONS OVER THE YEARS: FAITHFUL COPIES OR TRANSLATORS’ INTERPRETATIONS

Anna Dybiec, MA, AssistantThe Language and Culture Studies DepartmentInstitute of Modern Languages, Pedagogical FacultyJesuit University Ignatianum in Krakow, Polande-mail: [email protected]://orcid.org/0000-0003-1876-1812 ABSTRACT The article offers a comparative analysis of two of Charles Dickens’s Christmas Books: The Chimes (1844) and The Cricket on the Hearth (1845). Time influences literary fashions, which prompted me to conduct an analysis of these translations. Polish translations of the books were published at different times, encompassing the nineteenth, twentieth, and twenty-first centuries, which had a considerable impact on their poetics and quality. This paper aims to present various approaches to the linguistic representation of emotions in source texts and target texts. The study relies on structural analysis and cognitive linguistics, which includes spoken and written language, as well as non-verbal communication. It opens with a short introduction on the issue of emotions and how they can be examined. It also explores how languages manifest expressions of emotions and translators’ techniques to cover expressiveness. Special attention was given to various ways of depicting emotions in the texts, paying attention to the use of diminutives, metaphors, and phraseological units involving body organs (one of them being the “heart”) or symptoms of emotions. Triggered by interest in emotions in recent years, researchers have started to take them into account in research. Consequently, I claim that among the numerous linguistic works devoted to feelings and emotions, it is not easy to distinguish those whose corpus is a novel or literary fiction, especially from a comparative perspective in the retranslation. This article is part of the current research on the linguistic approaches to naming, communicating, and expressing emotions in literary texts compared to their translations as well as translators’ choices and their techniques. Hence, another notion that will be useful in the analysis is that of “retranslation”. However, although the issue of emotions has been tackled by many scholars, it seems still under-researched and it certainly seems possible to shed new light on how translators work and what drives their translation decisions. Thus, in the conclusions, I attempt to portray various ways of expressing emotion, as exemplified in The Chimes and The Cricket on the Hearth and their Polish renditions. Keywords: retranslation, Christmas Books, emotions, emotionality, linguistic expressions PDF How to cite:Dybiec, A. (2024). “The Original Versus Translations Over the Years: Faithful Copies or Translators’ Interpretations.” Journal of Comparative Studies 17 (46), 100-133. https://doi.org/10.59893/jcs.17(46).004

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Studies
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59893/jcs.17(46).004
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE ORIGINAL VERSUS TRANSLATIONS OVER THE YEARS: FAITHFUL COPIES OR TRANSLATORS’ INTERPRETATIONS

Journal of Comparative Studies
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

THE ORIGINAL VERSUS TRANSLATIONS OVER THE YEARS: FAITHFUL COPIES OR TRANSLATORS’ INTERPRETATIONS

article en

Abstract

Anna Dybiec, MA, AssistantThe Language and Culture Studies DepartmentInstitute of Modern Languages, Pedagogical FacultyJesuit University Ignatianum in Krakow, Polande-mail: [email protected]://orcid.org/0000-0003-1876-1812 ABSTRACT The article offers a comparative analysis of two of Charles Dickens’s Christmas Books: The Chimes (1844) and The Cricket on the Hearth (1845). Time influences literary fashions, which prompted me to conduct an analysis of these translations. Polish translations of the books were published at different times, encompassing the nineteenth, twentieth, and twenty-first centuries, which had a considerable impact on their poetics and quality. This paper aims to present various approaches to the linguistic representation of emotions in source texts and target texts. The study relies on structural analysis and cognitive linguistics, which includes spoken and written language, as well as non-verbal communication. It opens with a short introduction on the issue of emotions and how they can be examined. It also explores how languages manifest expressions of emotions and translators’ techniques to cover expressiveness. Special attention was given to various ways of depicting emotions in the texts, paying attention to the use of diminutives, metaphors, and phraseological units involving body organs (one of them being the “heart”) or symptoms of emotions. Triggered by interest in emotions in recent years, researchers have started to take them into account in research. Consequently, I claim that among the numerous linguistic works devoted to feelings and emotions, it is not easy to distinguish those whose corpus is a novel or literary fiction, especially from a comparative perspective in the retranslation. This article is part of the current research on the linguistic approaches to naming, communicating, and expressing emotions in literary texts compared to their translations as well as translators’ choices and their techniques. Hence, another notion that will be useful in the analysis is that of “retranslation”. However, although the issue of emotions has been tackled by many scholars, it seems still under-researched and it certainly seems possible to shed new light on how translators work and what drives their translation decisions. Thus, in the conclusions, I attempt to portray various ways of expressing emotion, as exemplified in The Chimes and The Cricket on the Hearth and their Polish renditions. Keywords: retranslation, Christmas Books, emotions, emotionality, linguistic expressions PDF How to cite:Dybiec, A. (2024). “The Original Versus Translations Over the Years: Faithful Copies or Translators’ Interpretations.” Journal of Comparative Studies 17 (46), 100-133. https://doi.org/10.59893/jcs.17(46).004

Journal of Comparative StudiesVol. 17(46)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.