Anti-herbivory defences delivered by <i>Epichloë </i>fungal endophytes: a quantitative review of alkaloid concentration variation among hosts and plant parts

Background and Aims: In the subfamily Poöideae (Poaceae), certain grass species possess anti-herbivore alkaloids synthesized by fungal endophytes that belong to the genus <i>Epichloë </i>(Clavicipitaceae). The protective role of these symbiotic endophytes can vary, depending on alkaloid concentrations within specific plant–endophyte associations and plant parts.Methods: We conducted a literature review to identify articles containing alkaloid concentration data for various plant parts in six important pasture species, <i>Lolium arundinaceum</i>, <i>Lolium perenne</i>, <i>Lolium pratense</i>, <i>Lolium multiflorum</i>|<i>Lolium rigidum</i> and <i>Festuca rubra</i>, associated with their common endophytes. We considered the alkaloids lolines (1-aminopyrrolizidines), peramine (pyrrolopyrazines), ergovaline (ergot alkaloids) and lolitrem B (indole-diterpenes). While all these alkaloids have shown bioactivity against insect herbivores, ergovaline and lolitrem B are harmful for mammals.Key Results: Loline alkaloid levels were higher in the perennial grasses <i>L. pratense</i> and <i>L. arundinaceum</i> compared to the annual species <i>L. multiflorum</i> and <i>L. rigidum</i>, and higher in reproductive tissues than in vegetative structures. This is probably due to the greater biomass accumulation in perennial species that can result in higher endophyte mycelial biomass. Peramine concentrations were higher in <i>L. perenne</i> than in <i>L. arundinaceum</i> and not affected by plant part. This can be attributed to the high within-plant mobility of peramine. Ergovaline and lolitrem B, both hydrophobic compounds, were associated with plant parts where fungal mycelium is usually present, and their concentrations were higher in plant reproductive tissues. Only loline alkaloid data were sufficient for below-ground tissue analyses and concentrations were lower than in above-ground parts.Conclusions: Our study provides a comprehensive synthesis of fungal alkaloid variation across host grasses and plant parts, essential for understanding the endophyte-conferred defence extent. The patterns can be understood by considering endophyte growth within the plant and alkaloid mobility. Our study identifies research gaps, including the limited documentation of alkaloid presence in roots and the need to investigate the influence of different environmental conditions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgResearch
Published
2024-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57935/agr.26409733
Primary Topic
Plant and fungal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti-herbivory defences delivered by Epichloë fungal endophytes: a quantitative review of alkaloid concentration variation among hosts and plant parts

AgResearch
Plant and fungal interactions
article

Anti-herbivory defences delivered by Epichloë fungal endophytes: a quantitative review of alkaloid concentration variation among hosts and plant parts

article en

Abstract

Background and Aims: In the subfamily Poöideae (Poaceae), certain grass species possess anti-herbivore alkaloids synthesized by fungal endophytes that belong to the genus <i>Epichloë </i>(Clavicipitaceae). The protective role of these symbiotic endophytes can vary, depending on alkaloid concentrations within specific plant–endophyte associations and plant parts.Methods: We conducted a literature review to identify articles containing alkaloid concentration data for various plant parts in six important pasture species, <i>Lolium arundinaceum</i>, <i>Lolium perenne</i>, <i>Lolium pratense</i>, <i>Lolium multiflorum</i>|<i>Lolium rigidum</i> and <i>Festuca rubra</i>, associated with their common endophytes. We considered the alkaloids lolines (1-aminopyrrolizidines), peramine (pyrrolopyrazines), ergovaline (ergot alkaloids) and lolitrem B (indole-diterpenes). While all these alkaloids have shown bioactivity against insect herbivores, ergovaline and lolitrem B are harmful for mammals.Key Results: Loline alkaloid levels were higher in the perennial grasses <i>L. pratense</i> and <i>L. arundinaceum</i> compared to the annual species <i>L. multiflorum</i> and <i>L. rigidum</i>, and higher in reproductive tissues than in vegetative structures. This is probably due to the greater biomass accumulation in perennial species that can result in higher endophyte mycelial biomass. Peramine concentrations were higher in <i>L. perenne</i> than in <i>L. arundinaceum</i> and not affected by plant part. This can be attributed to the high within-plant mobility of peramine. Ergovaline and lolitrem B, both hydrophobic compounds, were associated with plant parts where fungal mycelium is usually present, and their concentrations were higher in plant reproductive tissues. Only loline alkaloid data were sufficient for below-ground tissue analyses and concentrations were lower than in above-ground parts.Conclusions: Our study provides a comprehensive synthesis of fungal alkaloid variation across host grasses and plant parts, essential for understanding the endophyte-conferred defence extent. The patterns can be understood by considering endophyte growth within the plant and alkaloid mobility. Our study identifies research gaps, including the limited documentation of alkaloid presence in roots and the need to investigate the influence of different environmental conditions.

AgResearch
AgResearch (NZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Plant and fungal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.