Analysis of environmental sustainability using ecological footprint and bio-carrying capacity

To achieve sustainable development, it is crucial to conserve natural lands and implement sustainable land-use strategies. Environmental sustainability can be measured using indicators like Ecological Carrying Capacity (ECC) and Biological Capacity (BC). In this study, the ecological sustainability and potential trends of land degradation of Khorasan Razavi in Northeastern Iran were assessed using both Ecological Footprint (EF) and biological capacity. EF was calculated based on a combination of carbon footprint, agriculture, horticulture, aquaculture, and protein production and BC was determined according to land-use patterns. These indicators were analyzed at both regional and county levels to assess overall sustainability. The study area exhibited an EF of 31 Million (M) global hectares (gha) and a BC of 12.7 M gha, revealing an ecological deficit and unbalanced land development. To mitigate this, an area approximately 2.4 times larger than the current one would be required. In some parts of the region, the EF was found to be 21.1 M gha-substantially surpassing the biological capacity of 1.2 M gha, further indicating unsustainable land use. Over time, the over-exploitation and degradation of natural lands have contributed to the widening gap between EF and BC. This ecological imbalance can be addressed by reducing consumption, improving production efficiency, adopting advanced eco-friendly technologies, and expanding green areas to boost carbon sequestration. In addition, effective land-use regulations are necessary to achieve long-term sustainable development goals.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OICC Press Journals
Published
2025-07-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57647/j.jrs.2025.1503.28
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water Resources and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of environmental sustainability using ecological footprint and bio-carrying capacity

1 citations
OICC Press Journals
Water Resources and Sustainability
0.82
article

Analysis of environmental sustainability using ecological footprint and bio-carrying capacity

article en
1 citations

Abstract

To achieve sustainable development, it is crucial to conserve natural lands and implement sustainable land-use strategies. Environmental sustainability can be measured using indicators like Ecological Carrying Capacity (ECC) and Biological Capacity (BC). In this study, the ecological sustainability and potential trends of land degradation of Khorasan Razavi in Northeastern Iran were assessed using both Ecological Footprint (EF) and biological capacity. EF was calculated based on a combination of carbon footprint, agriculture, horticulture, aquaculture, and protein production and BC was determined according to land-use patterns. These indicators were analyzed at both regional and county levels to assess overall sustainability. The study area exhibited an EF of 31 Million (M) global hectares (gha) and a BC of 12.7 M gha, revealing an ecological deficit and unbalanced land development. To mitigate this, an area approximately 2.4 times larger than the current one would be required. In some parts of the region, the EF was found to be 21.1 M gha-substantially surpassing the biological capacity of 1.2 M gha, further indicating unsustainable land use. Over time, the over-exploitation and degradation of natural lands have contributed to the widening gap between EF and BC. This ecological imbalance can be addressed by reducing consumption, improving production efficiency, adopting advanced eco-friendly technologies, and expanding green areas to boost carbon sequestration. In addition, effective land-use regulations are necessary to achieve long-term sustainable development goals.

OICC Press Journals
Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (IR), Islamic Azad University Kashmar Branch (IR), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR), University of Birjand (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Water Resources and Sustainability
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of environmental sustainability using ecological footprint and bio-carrying capacity · OICC Press Journals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS