Factor Analytic Evaluation of the Outcome Probability Task

The computer-based Outcome Probability Task uses facilitated, anticipatory mental imagery to measure the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of negative evaluation in imagined social interactions. This is done by prompting respondents to imagine they will soon experience what is shown in a social image, then collecting ratings of expected embarrassment, humiliation, or negative judgment (0-100%). Participants (n = 283) were predominantly students, who reported diverse sociodemographic identities and endorsed varying psychological characteristics. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the stability of a three-factor model examining performance situations, probable judgment, and social gatherings. As hypothesized, the three-factor model was superior to an alternative bifactor model based on evaluation of fit metrics and factor loadings. Findings provide additional support that the Outcome Probability Task has potential to advance the multi-method assessment of social outcome probability bias subtypes. This could have positive implications for the innovation of transdiagnostic assessments and treatments.

Publication Details

Journal
Georgia State University Repository
Published
2025-07-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57709/tb53-yz68
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factor Analytic Evaluation of the Outcome Probability Task

Georgia State University Repository
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Factor Analytic Evaluation of the Outcome Probability Task

article en

Abstract

The computer-based Outcome Probability Task uses facilitated, anticipatory mental imagery to measure the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of negative evaluation in imagined social interactions. This is done by prompting respondents to imagine they will soon experience what is shown in a social image, then collecting ratings of expected embarrassment, humiliation, or negative judgment (0-100%). Participants (n = 283) were predominantly students, who reported diverse sociodemographic identities and endorsed varying psychological characteristics. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the stability of a three-factor model examining performance situations, probable judgment, and social gatherings. As hypothesized, the three-factor model was superior to an alternative bifactor model based on evaluation of fit metrics and factor loadings. Findings provide additional support that the Outcome Probability Task has potential to advance the multi-method assessment of social outcome probability bias subtypes. This could have positive implications for the innovation of transdiagnostic assessments and treatments.

Georgia State University Repository
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.