Comparative Analysis of Monohull and Catamaran Passenger Vessels: Performance in Shallow Waters

This study investigated modifying a 500 GT monohull passenger vessel into a catamaran while maintaining displacement, with the aim of enhancing resistance. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis, following the International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC) protocols, was employed to simulate fluid flow around vessel geometries. Simulations were conducted at 8 knots in shallow water with a depth of 3 m, resulting in a depth-to-draft ratio (h/t) of 1.5. The results showed that the monohull experienced a 102.56 kN resistance, which is 35% higher than that of the catamaran's 35.73 kN. The resistance of the monohull was influenced by the increased fluid flow velocity around the bow and stern, leading to a greater hull-water interaction. Pressure distribution analysis highlighted elevated pressure on the monohull bow due to high-velocity fluid interactions, while the catamaran configuration effectively managed the load distribution. Power calculations, assuming 50% efficiency, determined that the monohull required a 566 hp engine, whereas the catamaran required 197 hp. These findings emphasize the impact of vessel design on performance and efficiency, providing insights into engine selection and operational efficiency in maritime engineering.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15174020
Primary Topic
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Monohull and Catamaran Passenger Vessels: Performance in Shallow Waters

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
article

Comparative Analysis of Monohull and Catamaran Passenger Vessels: Performance in Shallow Waters

article en

Abstract

This study investigated modifying a 500 GT monohull passenger vessel into a catamaran while maintaining displacement, with the aim of enhancing resistance. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis, following the International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC) protocols, was employed to simulate fluid flow around vessel geometries. Simulations were conducted at 8 knots in shallow water with a depth of 3 m, resulting in a depth-to-draft ratio (h/t) of 1.5. The results showed that the monohull experienced a 102.56 kN resistance, which is 35% higher than that of the catamaran's 35.73 kN. The resistance of the monohull was influenced by the increased fluid flow velocity around the bow and stern, leading to a greater hull-water interaction. Pressure distribution analysis highlighted elevated pressure on the monohull bow due to high-velocity fluid interactions, while the catamaran configuration effectively managed the load distribution. Power calculations, assuming 50% efficiency, determined that the monohull required a 566 hp engine, whereas the catamaran required 197 hp. These findings emphasize the impact of vessel design on performance and efficiency, providing insights into engine selection and operational efficiency in maritime engineering.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Pattimura (ID)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Monohull and Catamaran Passenger Vessels: Performance in Shallow Waters · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS