Neutrosophic OWA-TOPSIS Model for Decision-Making in AI Systems with Large Volumes of Data

AI systems require transformations of big data critical to processing because the findings are based upon incomplete, inconsistent, and/or biased findings which mean that findings and subsequent achieved expectations will inevitably have limitations. This is problematic when engaging multi-criteria decision making with big data-driven projects like infiltration of personalized suggestions, AI-based medical diagnostics, and risk reduction efforts where any decision making with deficient data can reduce effective capabilities. The literature suggests that TOPSIS and OWA operators enable the prioritization of alternatives given ranked data; however, there is a gap in the literature regarding the suitability of decision making techniques to prioritize plithogenic uncertainty. Yet this is relevant because in life, things/ideas/situations aren't true or false—they're somewhere indeterminate. Thus, this paper presents a new, hybrid approach that combines OWA-TOPSIS with neutrosophic sets to determine how much truth, falsity, and indeterminacy exist for specific criteria within the decision making process. By adjusting neutrosophic distances and executing an entropy-dependent OWA weight to create a final decision ranking within the presented case, data can accurately render situations where customer reviews for products have good and bad features or scenarios where machine learning algorithm effectiveness has sometimes opposing results. This case study's findings indicate that this hybrid idea is more accurate than traditional TOPSIS, 89.4% vs. 82.1%, and more stable even at high uncertainty levels. The theoretical contribution to the academic literature expands notions of AI multi-criteria decision making process; the practical application lends itself to scalable possibilities within big data reliant cases, especially predictive sentiment analysis or resource allocation/optimization. The feasibility of neutrosophic applications within distributed interfaces (like Spark) shows the promise for real-time applications explored without delay.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15641634
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neutrosophic OWA-TOPSIS Model for Decision-Making in AI Systems with Large Volumes of Data

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Neutrosophic OWA-TOPSIS Model for Decision-Making in AI Systems with Large Volumes of Data

article en

Abstract

AI systems require transformations of big data critical to processing because the findings are based upon incomplete, inconsistent, and/or biased findings which mean that findings and subsequent achieved expectations will inevitably have limitations. This is problematic when engaging multi-criteria decision making with big data-driven projects like infiltration of personalized suggestions, AI-based medical diagnostics, and risk reduction efforts where any decision making with deficient data can reduce effective capabilities. The literature suggests that TOPSIS and OWA operators enable the prioritization of alternatives given ranked data; however, there is a gap in the literature regarding the suitability of decision making techniques to prioritize plithogenic uncertainty. Yet this is relevant because in life, things/ideas/situations aren't true or false—they're somewhere indeterminate. Thus, this paper presents a new, hybrid approach that combines OWA-TOPSIS with neutrosophic sets to determine how much truth, falsity, and indeterminacy exist for specific criteria within the decision making process. By adjusting neutrosophic distances and executing an entropy-dependent OWA weight to create a final decision ranking within the presented case, data can accurately render situations where customer reviews for products have good and bad features or scenarios where machine learning algorithm effectiveness has sometimes opposing results. This case study's findings indicate that this hybrid idea is more accurate than traditional TOPSIS, 89.4% vs. 82.1%, and more stable even at high uncertainty levels. The theoretical contribution to the academic literature expands notions of AI multi-criteria decision making process; the practical application lends itself to scalable possibilities within big data reliant cases, especially predictive sentiment analysis or resource allocation/optimization. The feasibility of neutrosophic applications within distributed interfaces (like Spark) shows the promise for real-time applications explored without delay.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.