Triplaris arnottiana Meisn. 1856

Triplaris arnottiana Meisn. (1856: 176) Type (designated here):—[ECUADOR]. Ad flum. Guayaquil (at the river Guayaquil), [1822] (fr), Jameson s.n. (lectotype: K [K 585001, digital image!], isolectotype: NY 324209 [digital imag!]). Notes:— Meisner referenced a collection “Ad flum. Guayaquil (Jameson!)” and later “(v.s. in h. Arnott.)”. Brandbyge (1986) located a single Jameson s.n. collection at K that matches the protologue and was a part of Arnott’s herbarium. While this appears to be the specimen referenced by Meisner, because Meisner also referenced the entire collection, we cannot be certain that this was the only specimen he considered while writing his description.As a result, this specimen is considered a lectotype not the holotype (Art. 9.1 of ICBN). A duplicate of this specimen is located at NY. Both the lectotype and the isolectotype are only fruit collections. The NY specimen comes with metadata indicating that it was collected in 1822. This date is not written on the sheet itself or given in the protologue.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16727293
Primary Topic
Plant Diversity and Evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Triplaris arnottiana Meisn. 1856

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Plant Diversity and Evolution
article

Triplaris arnottiana Meisn. 1856

article en

Abstract

Triplaris arnottiana Meisn. (1856: 176) Type (designated here):—[ECUADOR]. Ad flum. Guayaquil (at the river Guayaquil), [1822] (fr), Jameson s.n. (lectotype: K [K 585001, digital image!], isolectotype: NY 324209 [digital imag!]). Notes:— Meisner referenced a collection “Ad flum. Guayaquil (Jameson!)” and later “(v.s. in h. Arnott.)”. Brandbyge (1986) located a single Jameson s.n. collection at K that matches the protologue and was a part of Arnott’s herbarium. While this appears to be the specimen referenced by Meisner, because Meisner also referenced the entire collection, we cannot be certain that this was the only specimen he considered while writing his description.As a result, this specimen is considered a lectotype not the holotype (Art. 9.1 of ICBN). A duplicate of this specimen is located at NY. Both the lectotype and the isolectotype are only fruit collections. The NY specimen comes with metadata indicating that it was collected in 1822. This date is not written on the sheet itself or given in the protologue.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Howard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Plant Diversity and Evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.