You Don't Have to Live Next to Me: Towards Demobilizing Individualistic Bias in Computational Approaches to Urban Segregation

Segregation, conceptualized as the spatial expression of social inequalities, is a common phenomenon across different urban contexts. The increasing popularity of Big Data and computational models has inspired many computational studies on urban segregation. However, these studies are often epistemologically interdependent with prevalent economic theories, which have a hyperfocus on individual responsibility while neglecting systemic processes. We outline how individualistic bias impacts (de)segregation policies, and how disregarding data ethics leads to further marginalization of disadvantaged groups. Our essay suggests revisiting our computational processes to demobilize individualistic bias, fostering instead a collective, conscious, and systemic approach toward inequalities.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15231696
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

You Don't Have to Live Next to Me: Towards Demobilizing Individualistic Bias in Computational Approaches to Urban Segregation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

You Don't Have to Live Next to Me: Towards Demobilizing Individualistic Bias in Computational Approaches to Urban Segregation

article en

Abstract

Segregation, conceptualized as the spatial expression of social inequalities, is a common phenomenon across different urban contexts. The increasing popularity of Big Data and computational models has inspired many computational studies on urban segregation. However, these studies are often epistemologically interdependent with prevalent economic theories, which have a hyperfocus on individual responsibility while neglecting systemic processes. We outline how individualistic bias impacts (de)segregation policies, and how disregarding data ethics leads to further marginalization of disadvantaged groups. Our essay suggests revisiting our computational processes to demobilize individualistic bias, fostering instead a collective, conscious, and systemic approach toward inequalities.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Bristol (GB), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.