From University to Battlefield: How a Narrative Took Power

This article analyzes the specific Ukrainian interpretation of global decolonial discourse and its consequences for culture, academia, politics, and military strategy. Drawing on the critiques of philosopher Andrii Baumeister and military expert Oleksii Arestovych, the work explores how the rejection of perceived “colonial” heritage—particularly Russian cultural and historical figures—has evolved into a state ideology influencing decision-making across multiple domains. A key mechanism is identified: university ➡️ public opinion ➡️ state ideology ➡️ symbolic actions, whereby academic endorsement of a temporary ideological trend legitimizes it socially and politically, eventually leading to performative measures disconnected from practical needs. The study examines the erosion of Ukraine’s multifaceted cultural identity, the narrowing of academic freedoms, and the adoption of symbolic political and military decisions that disregard established traditions. It situates the Ukrainian case within broader discussions on ideology formation, post-colonial identity, and the risks of cultural reductionism during wartime, concluding that the current trajectory may undermine the very values and heritage the country seeks to defend.