Eupogonius longipilis Bates 1880

Eupogonius longipilis Bates, 1880 (Figs. 9, 10A–C) Eupogonius longipilis Bates 1880: 117; Monné 2023b: 623 Remarks. When Bates (1880) described E. longipilis, he did not indicate the type locality. Bates (1885) reported, “The localities of this species were accidentally omitted; the species was described from a Guatemalan example. Hab. Mexico, Jalapa, Paso del Macho (Höge), Playa Vicente (Sallé); Guatemala, San Gerónimo [= San Jerónimo], Chacoj (Champion).” The first sentence in Bates (1885) about E. longipilis also includes an error: in the first clause, he said that “The localities of this species were,” but then he stated that there was only one specimen from Guatemala. Therefore, the species was described based on a holotype. However, Monné (2023b) and Tavakilian and Chevillotte (2023) reported that the species was described based on syntypes. Monné (2023b) reported only that the syntypes were from Guatemala. Tavakilian and Chevillotte (2023) reported that the syntypes were from Guatemala, Baja Verapaz, San Jéronimo and were collected by G.C. Champion. We do not know if Gérard L. Tavakilian saw the holotype at the BMNH. Even if there were syntypes and not only a holotype, it would not be possible to say that they were all from San Jerónimo. This is because Bates (1885) recorded two different places in Guatemala. According to Selander and Vaurie (1962): “San Gerónimo = San Jerónimo, Baja Verapaz, Guatemala. Town in the highlands about 10 km southeast of Salama: 15°08 0, 90°11 0. This locality is listed erroneously at least once in the ‘Biologia’ for México ”; “Chacoj, Alta Verapaz, Guatemala. Settlement (formerly called La Hamaca) on the Rio Polochic just west of La Tinta; shown on “Biologia” Map 8 at about 15° 19 0 N, 89° 56 0 W.” Fortunately, Keita Matsumoto (Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom) sent us photographs of the holotype (Fig. 10A) and its labels (Fig. 10B). Based on those, we now can affirm that the type locality is San Jerónimo in the Guatemalan state of Baja Verapaz. Currently, E. longipilis is known from Mexico (Veracruz), Guatemala, Honduras, and Panama (Bezark 2023; Monné 2023b; Tavakilian and Chevillotte 2023). Material examined. MEXICO, Chiapas (new state record): MX190, 5 km S of Ososingo [sic, Ocosingo], 1 male, 1 female, 8.vi.2009, Skillman and Hildebrandt (FWSC); Ocozocoautla, 3 km W Laguna Bélgica, 16º 53 0 31.5 0 0 N, 93º 27 0 09.5 0 0 W, 956 m, atraído a la luz, 1 male, 4-vi-2005., V.H. Toledo (CIUM).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15701712
Primary Topic
Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eupogonius longipilis Bates 1880

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies
article

Eupogonius longipilis Bates 1880

article en

Abstract

Eupogonius longipilis Bates, 1880 (Figs. 9, 10A–C) Eupogonius longipilis Bates 1880: 117; Monné 2023b: 623 Remarks. When Bates (1880) described E. longipilis, he did not indicate the type locality. Bates (1885) reported, “The localities of this species were accidentally omitted; the species was described from a Guatemalan example. Hab. Mexico, Jalapa, Paso del Macho (Höge), Playa Vicente (Sallé); Guatemala, San Gerónimo [= San Jerónimo], Chacoj (Champion).” The first sentence in Bates (1885) about E. longipilis also includes an error: in the first clause, he said that “The localities of this species were,” but then he stated that there was only one specimen from Guatemala. Therefore, the species was described based on a holotype. However, Monné (2023b) and Tavakilian and Chevillotte (2023) reported that the species was described based on syntypes. Monné (2023b) reported only that the syntypes were from Guatemala. Tavakilian and Chevillotte (2023) reported that the syntypes were from Guatemala, Baja Verapaz, San Jéronimo and were collected by G.C. Champion. We do not know if Gérard L. Tavakilian saw the holotype at the BMNH. Even if there were syntypes and not only a holotype, it would not be possible to say that they were all from San Jerónimo. This is because Bates (1885) recorded two different places in Guatemala. According to Selander and Vaurie (1962): “San Gerónimo = San Jerónimo, Baja Verapaz, Guatemala. Town in the highlands about 10 km southeast of Salama: 15°08 0, 90°11 0. This locality is listed erroneously at least once in the ‘Biologia’ for México ”; “Chacoj, Alta Verapaz, Guatemala. Settlement (formerly called La Hamaca) on the Rio Polochic just west of La Tinta; shown on “Biologia” Map 8 at about 15° 19 0 N, 89° 56 0 W.” Fortunately, Keita Matsumoto (Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom) sent us photographs of the holotype (Fig. 10A) and its labels (Fig. 10B). Based on those, we now can affirm that the type locality is San Jerónimo in the Guatemalan state of Baja Verapaz. Currently, E. longipilis is known from Mexico (Veracruz), Guatemala, Honduras, and Panama (Bezark 2023; Monné 2023b; Tavakilian and Chevillotte 2023). Material examined. MEXICO, Chiapas (new state record): MX190, 5 km S of Ososingo [sic, Ocosingo], 1 male, 1 female, 8.vi.2009, Skillman and Hildebrandt (FWSC); Ocozocoautla, 3 km W Laguna Bélgica, 16º 53 0 31.5 0 0 N, 93º 27 0 09.5 0 0 W, 956 m, atraído a la luz, 1 male, 4-vi-2005., V.H. Toledo (CIUM).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO), São Paulo Museum of Art (BR), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.