CAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COME TO HAVE AN AUTONOMOUS EXISTENCE?

This essay addresses the topic that most challenges humanity at the moment: the speculation about whether Artificial Intelligence (AI) can acquire an autonomous existence. Its scientific relevance lies in the fact that it sheds light on the spaces that are open and already occupied by machines that perform mechanical tasks that were previously only human specificities. Added to this is the development of programs and databases that allow access to information randomly, making it seem like an autonomous intelligence, when in fact it is neither intelligent nor merely automated. Its social relevance lies in the fact that it makes it clear to the general population that no machine can replace human beings, because humans think and reflect on what they think, and their actions and procedures are governed by some kind of pathos, something that is impossible for automatons. This is a broad and in-depth bibliographical and analytical research, with the aim of summarizing a discussion that permeates the contemporary world. The fact that Artificial Intelligence selects, among a myriad of information, one that is closest to what was requested, does not make it intelligent, considering that intelligent behavior is the product of the analysis of the situation to which a value judgment is applied, not a mechanical sentence. This overvaluation of artificial thinking as if it faithfully represented the essence of human abstract thinking has as its ultimate consequence a significant, growing and constant loss of the ability to interpret objective reality, because the simplest problems cease to be analyzed and, with this, the big problems also end up being delegated to a type of agent that has no social responsibility for its decision. This represents the real danger for the future, a replacement of the technical explanation about a decision based on the values of a society for the elaboration of justifications for the action of an automaton, as if this, by itself, were capable of correcting the damage caused to those involved.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15078215
Primary Topic
Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COME TO HAVE AN AUTONOMOUS EXISTENCE?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Communication and COVID-19 Impact
article

CAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COME TO HAVE AN AUTONOMOUS EXISTENCE?

article en

Abstract

This essay addresses the topic that most challenges humanity at the moment: the speculation about whether Artificial Intelligence (AI) can acquire an autonomous existence. Its scientific relevance lies in the fact that it sheds light on the spaces that are open and already occupied by machines that perform mechanical tasks that were previously only human specificities. Added to this is the development of programs and databases that allow access to information randomly, making it seem like an autonomous intelligence, when in fact it is neither intelligent nor merely automated. Its social relevance lies in the fact that it makes it clear to the general population that no machine can replace human beings, because humans think and reflect on what they think, and their actions and procedures are governed by some kind of pathos, something that is impossible for automatons. This is a broad and in-depth bibliographical and analytical research, with the aim of summarizing a discussion that permeates the contemporary world. The fact that Artificial Intelligence selects, among a myriad of information, one that is closest to what was requested, does not make it intelligent, considering that intelligent behavior is the product of the analysis of the situation to which a value judgment is applied, not a mechanical sentence. This overvaluation of artificial thinking as if it faithfully represented the essence of human abstract thinking has as its ultimate consequence a significant, growing and constant loss of the ability to interpret objective reality, because the simplest problems cease to be analyzed and, with this, the big problems also end up being delegated to a type of agent that has no social responsibility for its decision. This represents the real danger for the future, a replacement of the technical explanation about a decision based on the values of a society for the elaboration of justifications for the action of an automaton, as if this, by itself, were capable of correcting the damage caused to those involved.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Communication and COVID-19 Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.