Integrating α-Discounting and Neutrosophic Decision Modeling in University Ideological and Political Education under Party-Building Leadership

This research proposes a novel decision-making framework to enhance ideological and political education (IPE) in universities by integrating the α-Discounting Multi-Criteria Decision Making (α-D MCDM) method with Neutrosophic Logic. The objective is to reconcile conflicting perspectives—such as party directives, academic values, and student attitudes—within a consistent and mathematically rigorous structure. The methodology allows for modeling imprecise, vague, or uncertain preferences using neutrosophic truth values (T, I, F), which are then incorporated into α-parameterized systems of linear and nonlinear equations. A detailed case study is included, simulating decision inputs from multiple university stakeholders, and fully worked with precise mathematical calculations and normalized outcomes. This integrated model provides a scalable and adaptable mechanism for ideological alignment, stakeholder balance, and political leadership optimization in educational strategy.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15691287
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating α-Discounting and Neutrosophic Decision Modeling in University Ideological and Political Education under Party-Building Leadership

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Integrating α-Discounting and Neutrosophic Decision Modeling in University Ideological and Political Education under Party-Building Leadership

article en

Abstract

This research proposes a novel decision-making framework to enhance ideological and political education (IPE) in universities by integrating the α-Discounting Multi-Criteria Decision Making (α-D MCDM) method with Neutrosophic Logic. The objective is to reconcile conflicting perspectives—such as party directives, academic values, and student attitudes—within a consistent and mathematically rigorous structure. The methodology allows for modeling imprecise, vague, or uncertain preferences using neutrosophic truth values (T, I, F), which are then incorporated into α-parameterized systems of linear and nonlinear equations. A detailed case study is included, simulating decision inputs from multiple university stakeholders, and fully worked with precise mathematical calculations and normalized outcomes. This integrated model provides a scalable and adaptable mechanism for ideological alignment, stakeholder balance, and political leadership optimization in educational strategy.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating α-Discounting and Neutrosophic Decision Modeling in University Ideological and Political Education under Party-Building Leadership · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS