Perisama camelita

Perisama camelita (Hewitson, 1876) stat. reinst. This taxon was described as Catagramma camelita by Hewitson (1876), placed in Perisama by Röber (1924), and cited as a separate species by most authors (e.g. Descimon 1995, Lamas 2004). It was, however, considered as a subspecies of P. alicia (Hewitson, 1868) by Attal & Crosson-du-Cormier (1996, 2010) who based their conclusions on the similarities between these two taxa in male genitalia and wing colour patterns. It would not be the case of a subspecies or individual form differing from the nominate morphotype in the ground colour of its ventral wing surface. However, in their case, both morphotypes had a red costal margin of the hind wing. On the other hand, P. camelita exhibits no costal red, whereas P. alicia does. The red costal margin is a conservative character within Perisama, and there is multiple evidence, that it is a species-specific character. Therefore, in agreement with Lamas (2004) the specific status of P. camelita is formally reinstated here.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15477727
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perisama camelita

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
article

Perisama camelita

article en

Abstract

Perisama camelita (Hewitson, 1876) stat. reinst. This taxon was described as Catagramma camelita by Hewitson (1876), placed in Perisama by Röber (1924), and cited as a separate species by most authors (e.g. Descimon 1995, Lamas 2004). It was, however, considered as a subspecies of P. alicia (Hewitson, 1868) by Attal & Crosson-du-Cormier (1996, 2010) who based their conclusions on the similarities between these two taxa in male genitalia and wing colour patterns. It would not be the case of a subspecies or individual form differing from the nominate morphotype in the ground colour of its ventral wing surface. However, in their case, both morphotypes had a red costal margin of the hind wing. On the other hand, P. camelita exhibits no costal red, whereas P. alicia does. The red costal margin is a conservative character within Perisama, and there is multiple evidence, that it is a species-specific character. Therefore, in agreement with Lamas (2004) the specific status of P. camelita is formally reinstated here.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Lund University (SE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perisama camelita · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS