Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Amlodipine, Cilnidipine, and Calcium Channel Antagonists on the QT Interval in Hypertensive Patients

Background: 12-lead electrocardiography measures the length of the QT interval, which is a marker of myocardial repolarization and is frequently used to characterize cardiac abnormalities, identify cardiac toxicity, and assess drug safety. After controlling for the impact of other risk variables, the QT interval in hypertension can predict the risk of both coronary events and cardiovascular death. Calcium channel blockers are the first-line medication for treating hypertension, according to the American Heart Association and JNC VIII. Numerous investigations have shown that amlodipine and cilnidipine, when taken at comparable doses, have an equipotent antihypertensive impact. Aims of this study to compare and evaluate the effects of calcium channel antagonists amlodipine and cilnidipine on QT interval among hypertensive patients. Methods: During that time, 129 patients in all were screened, evaluated, and recruited as study participants. Following enrollment, the patients were split into one category: hypertensive patients (n = 80). Amlodipine (2.5–10 mg) or cilnidipine (5–20 mg) with or without an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) was administered to a subset of patients, and (2) hypertensive patients with managed diabetes (n = 49) Selected participants were given antidiabetic medicine combined with either amlodipine (2.5–10 mg) or cilnidipine (5–20 mg), with or without an ARB. QT interval/√ (relative risk [RR] interval), where RR interval = 60/heart rate, is calculated using Bazett’s method (the most often used), with normal QTc ≤440 ms. Patients with hypertension had their QT intervals tested both at baseline and after a year of medication. Results: Although there was no therapeutic significance, there was a very significant decrease in QTc with cilnidipine therapy and a significant increase with amlodipine medication. Extremely significant and clinically important differences between amlodipine and cilnidipine were observed while comparing their effects. Conclusion: According to this study, cilnidipine is a better option than amlodipine for patients with a lengthy QT interval since it shortens the QTc interval.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14599337
Primary Topic
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Amlodipine, Cilnidipine, and Calcium Channel Antagonists on the QT Interval in Hypertensive Patients

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
article

Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Amlodipine, Cilnidipine, and Calcium Channel Antagonists on the QT Interval in Hypertensive Patients

article en

Abstract

Background: 12-lead electrocardiography measures the length of the QT interval, which is a marker of myocardial repolarization and is frequently used to characterize cardiac abnormalities, identify cardiac toxicity, and assess drug safety. After controlling for the impact of other risk variables, the QT interval in hypertension can predict the risk of both coronary events and cardiovascular death. Calcium channel blockers are the first-line medication for treating hypertension, according to the American Heart Association and JNC VIII. Numerous investigations have shown that amlodipine and cilnidipine, when taken at comparable doses, have an equipotent antihypertensive impact. Aims of this study to compare and evaluate the effects of calcium channel antagonists amlodipine and cilnidipine on QT interval among hypertensive patients. Methods: During that time, 129 patients in all were screened, evaluated, and recruited as study participants. Following enrollment, the patients were split into one category: hypertensive patients (n = 80). Amlodipine (2.5–10 mg) or cilnidipine (5–20 mg) with or without an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) was administered to a subset of patients, and (2) hypertensive patients with managed diabetes (n = 49) Selected participants were given antidiabetic medicine combined with either amlodipine (2.5–10 mg) or cilnidipine (5–20 mg), with or without an ARB. QT interval/√ (relative risk [RR] interval), where RR interval = 60/heart rate, is calculated using Bazett’s method (the most often used), with normal QTc ≤440 ms. Patients with hypertension had their QT intervals tested both at baseline and after a year of medication. Results: Although there was no therapeutic significance, there was a very significant decrease in QTc with cilnidipine therapy and a significant increase with amlodipine medication. Extremely significant and clinically important differences between amlodipine and cilnidipine were observed while comparing their effects. Conclusion: According to this study, cilnidipine is a better option than amlodipine for patients with a lengthy QT interval since it shortens the QTc interval.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Government Medical College (IN), Government Medical College (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.