Report on Design Principles for Emotion Sensitive Policy Making

PLEDGE brings theory and practice together and generates tools to promote effective policy-making and communication that will enhance emotionally intelligent and responsive democratic governance. This report lays the foundations for such a democratic design approach. To map the existing knowledge about deliberative democratic innovations and emotions, it combines an explanatory review of the literature with semi-structured interviews with international practitioners and experts in the field. In so doing, we establish and explore a new research agenda, with the potential to inform future initiatives that will enhance the link between citizens, policymakers and political elites through deliberative practices. We identified a threefold relationship that emotions have with deliberative democratic innovations: (i) emotions are (dis)incentives to participate and commit to deliberation; (ii) emotions are features of deliberative practices; and (iii) emotions are outcomes of deliberative practices. This report discusses these three dimensions with eyes fixed on the development of emotion-sensitive democratic innovations, and reflects on practices that further the emotional mechanism of solidarity-oriented sharing to occur.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15348616
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Report on Design Principles for Emotion Sensitive Policy Making

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Social Media and Politics
article

Report on Design Principles for Emotion Sensitive Policy Making

article en

Abstract

PLEDGE brings theory and practice together and generates tools to promote effective policy-making and communication that will enhance emotionally intelligent and responsive democratic governance. This report lays the foundations for such a democratic design approach. To map the existing knowledge about deliberative democratic innovations and emotions, it combines an explanatory review of the literature with semi-structured interviews with international practitioners and experts in the field. In so doing, we establish and explore a new research agenda, with the potential to inform future initiatives that will enhance the link between citizens, policymakers and political elites through deliberative practices. We identified a threefold relationship that emotions have with deliberative democratic innovations: (i) emotions are (dis)incentives to participate and commit to deliberation; (ii) emotions are features of deliberative practices; and (iii) emotions are outcomes of deliberative practices. This report discusses these three dimensions with eyes fixed on the development of emotion-sensitive democratic innovations, and reflects on practices that further the emotional mechanism of solidarity-oriented sharing to occur.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.