CIVIL LIABILITY FOR CYBER HARM: INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES

This article explores the evolving landscape of civil liability for cyber harm through international, comparative, and national lenses, focusing on developments from 2022 to 2025. It examines how legal systems are redefining responsibility in the digital age, with an emphasis on regulatory obligations, civil remedies, and conceptual innovations. International frameworks like the EU’s DORA, CRA, and NIS2, along with OECD recommendations, establish risk-based accountability for cyber resilience. Comparative analysis highlights diverse national approaches in Canada, the UK, Singapore, and others—ranging from statutory duties for platform safety to cybersecurity certification regimes. Uzbekistan’s legal transformation is presented as a dynamic case study of emerging liability models in developing jurisdictions. The article also integrates academic theories on digital harm, strict liability, digital fiduciaries, and hybrid regulatory models, revealing a shift toward proactive and preventive legal standards. This synthesis contributes to understanding how legal doctrine, regulatory design, and technology interact to shape a maturing civil liability regime for cyber risks worldwide.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15798970
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CIVIL LIABILITY FOR CYBER HARM: INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

CIVIL LIABILITY FOR CYBER HARM: INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES

article en

Abstract

This article explores the evolving landscape of civil liability for cyber harm through international, comparative, and national lenses, focusing on developments from 2022 to 2025. It examines how legal systems are redefining responsibility in the digital age, with an emphasis on regulatory obligations, civil remedies, and conceptual innovations. International frameworks like the EU’s DORA, CRA, and NIS2, along with OECD recommendations, establish risk-based accountability for cyber resilience. Comparative analysis highlights diverse national approaches in Canada, the UK, Singapore, and others—ranging from statutory duties for platform safety to cybersecurity certification regimes. Uzbekistan’s legal transformation is presented as a dynamic case study of emerging liability models in developing jurisdictions. The article also integrates academic theories on digital harm, strict liability, digital fiduciaries, and hybrid regulatory models, revealing a shift toward proactive and preventive legal standards. This synthesis contributes to understanding how legal doctrine, regulatory design, and technology interact to shape a maturing civil liability regime for cyber risks worldwide.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.