Issues of interlanguage homonymy (proximates) in the Turkic languages: on the example of the Tatar and Kazakh languages

Abstract: The article touches upon the topic of interlanguage lexical correspondences of a homonymic nature based on the material of the Kazakh and Tatar languages, which represent lexical problems in the compilation of bilingual dictionaries and in translation practice. The relevance of the presented work is due to the need for a comprehensive study of the processes of interaction and mutual influence of lexical systems of related languages and the need to study and analyze interlanguage lexical deceptive correspondences between the Kazakh and Tatar languages. This is an important topic for linguists and researchers, as understanding such correspondences will help expand our knowledge of the relationships and similarities between these two Turkic languages. This article examines the interlanguage lexical correspondences of a homonymic nature based on the material of the Kazakh and Tatar languages, analyzes the theoretical aspects and practical applications of correspondences, as well as their significance for lexicographers, linguists and translators. The goals and objectives of the study are to conduct an in-depth analysis of the lexical correspondences between the Kazakh and Tatar languages, with an emphasis on deceptive correspondences. The research objectives include: analysis of lexical structures and similarities between the Kazakh and Tatar languages, identification of words that may be perceived as deceptive correspondences due to similarity of sound or spelling, but have different meanings or origins; study of historical context and cultural factors that may influence the appearance of deceptive correspondences between languages; assessment of the influence of interlanguage contacts on the formation of lexical deceptive correspondences and their modern use in both languages; presentation of practical examples and studies demonstrating the prevalence and importance of interlanguage lexical deceptive correspondences for native speakers of the Kazakh and Tatar languages. The obtained results contribute to the study of interlanguage correspondences and contribute to a deeper understanding of the specifics of the interaction of related language systems.