Understanding Human Factors in Aircraft Avionics Operations

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016, specifically Section 2102 on Cockpit Automation Management, requires aircraft companies to ensure that air carrier training programs incorporate training for pilots to monitor automation systems and control the flight path without using autopilot or auto flight systems. The Act also mandates the development of measurable metrics to evaluate pilot monitoring proficiency, offers guidance for aviation safety inspectors in assessing pilots’ manual flight skills, and provides standards for enhanced pilot training as defined in the November 12, 2013, Federal Register final rule. This research explores the complexities of human factors in operating aircraft with avionics, focusing on the experiences and challenges aviation students encounter. Against a regulatory backdrop and the prevalence of advanced avionic systems, the study investigates avionics training effectiveness, operational challenges, human-technology interactions, the necessity of ongoing training, and safety risk mitigation. Through a qualitative approach, data was collected from interviews with aviation students, highlighting the critical need for rigorous training, effective human-technology interaction, continuous skill enhancement, and comprehensive safety measures in aviation operations.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14561180
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Human Factors in Aircraft Avionics Operations

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Understanding Human Factors in Aircraft Avionics Operations

article en

Abstract

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016, specifically Section 2102 on Cockpit Automation Management, requires aircraft companies to ensure that air carrier training programs incorporate training for pilots to monitor automation systems and control the flight path without using autopilot or auto flight systems. The Act also mandates the development of measurable metrics to evaluate pilot monitoring proficiency, offers guidance for aviation safety inspectors in assessing pilots’ manual flight skills, and provides standards for enhanced pilot training as defined in the November 12, 2013, Federal Register final rule. This research explores the complexities of human factors in operating aircraft with avionics, focusing on the experiences and challenges aviation students encounter. Against a regulatory backdrop and the prevalence of advanced avionic systems, the study investigates avionics training effectiveness, operational challenges, human-technology interactions, the necessity of ongoing training, and safety risk mitigation. Through a qualitative approach, data was collected from interviews with aviation students, highlighting the critical need for rigorous training, effective human-technology interaction, continuous skill enhancement, and comprehensive safety measures in aviation operations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.