An Empirical Study on Low-Code Platforms for Business Process Automation in Hybrid Cloud Environments

This article presents an empirical evaluation of low-code platforms for business process automation in hybrid cloud environments. Four prominent platforms were assessed across deployment flexibility, integration capabilities, security features, usability, and performance metrics using a healthcare prior authorization workflow as a standardized test case. The architectural analysis revealed distinct approaches ranging from unified architectures with multi-level caching to cloud-native microservices, each with unique integration and security capabilities. Implementation metrics demonstrated significant variations in development effort and deployment complexity, while performance testing highlighted differences in transaction processing speed, scalability characteristics, and resource utilization. The discussion identifies contextual factors influencing platform selection, including industry vertical considerations, organizational capability factors, and process complexity requirements. A structured decision framework guides organizations in selecting appropriate platforms based on regulatory requirements, legacy integration needs, time-to-market priorities, process complexity, and hybrid topology requirements. The results establish that no single platform offers a universal solution for all hybrid cloud scenarios.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15916372
Primary Topic
Software System Performance and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Empirical Study on Low-Code Platforms for Business Process Automation in Hybrid Cloud Environments

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Software System Performance and Reliability
article

An Empirical Study on Low-Code Platforms for Business Process Automation in Hybrid Cloud Environments

article en

Abstract

This article presents an empirical evaluation of low-code platforms for business process automation in hybrid cloud environments. Four prominent platforms were assessed across deployment flexibility, integration capabilities, security features, usability, and performance metrics using a healthcare prior authorization workflow as a standardized test case. The architectural analysis revealed distinct approaches ranging from unified architectures with multi-level caching to cloud-native microservices, each with unique integration and security capabilities. Implementation metrics demonstrated significant variations in development effort and deployment complexity, while performance testing highlighted differences in transaction processing speed, scalability characteristics, and resource utilization. The discussion identifies contextual factors influencing platform selection, including industry vertical considerations, organizational capability factors, and process complexity requirements. A structured decision framework guides organizations in selecting appropriate platforms based on regulatory requirements, legacy integration needs, time-to-market priorities, process complexity, and hybrid topology requirements. The results establish that no single platform offers a universal solution for all hybrid cloud scenarios.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Applied Logic Laboratory (Hungary) (HU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Software System Performance and Reliability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.