D7.4: Report summarising the impact of the oceanic and atmospheric boundary layer schemes in the coupled system

About this document This report presents the evaluation of key performance metrics in SR-ESMs with improved representation of the oceanic and atmospheric boundary layers with a focus on the tropics and on the Southern Ocean. Work package in charge WP7 Executive summary The main objective of WP6 has been to tune the existing ocean and atmospheric boundary layer schemes for the forced ocean and the atmosphere components of the ICON and IFSFESOM Storm-resolving ESMs (SREMS). This allowed for detailed investigations of mixing processes, because turbulence observations are available for a particular storm. The objective of the present D7.4 is now to evaluate how these boundary layer schemes affect the representation of climate in the nextGEMS coupled systems. As in WP6 we find that the details of the boundary layer schemes do not much affect the existing biases so that the ultimate choice of the boundary layer schemes in both, atmosphere and ocean, are determined by practical considerations: future IFS simulations will continue to use K-profile theory to parameterize boundary layer turbulence and eddy-diffusive mass-flux to parameterize turbulence and cloud formation in the boundary layer. This is motivated by the high accuracy, a key objective for operational agencies like ECMWF. future ICON-A simulations will avoid physics parameterizations beyond the Smagorinsky closureto dissipate energy at the grid scale. This makes the model physics and dynamics transparentand turns ICON-A into an ideal research tool. future IFS-FESOM simulations will be done with the K-profile paramterization (KPP), becauseit provides a realistic 20th century increase in global temperatures. The alternative scheme, theTurbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE) parameterization mixes too much, which results in unrealistic20th century warming. future ICON-O simulation will be done with the TKE scheme for two reasons: it is energy based(rather than the empirical KPP), which allows easy combination with the abyssal mixing schemeIDEMIX, and KPP is licensed under GNU, which would limit further applications.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15805346
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

D7.4: Report summarising the impact of the oceanic and atmospheric boundary layer schemes in the coupled system

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

D7.4: Report summarising the impact of the oceanic and atmospheric boundary layer schemes in the coupled system

article en

Abstract

About this document This report presents the evaluation of key performance metrics in SR-ESMs with improved representation of the oceanic and atmospheric boundary layers with a focus on the tropics and on the Southern Ocean. Work package in charge WP7 Executive summary The main objective of WP6 has been to tune the existing ocean and atmospheric boundary layer schemes for the forced ocean and the atmosphere components of the ICON and IFSFESOM Storm-resolving ESMs (SREMS). This allowed for detailed investigations of mixing processes, because turbulence observations are available for a particular storm. The objective of the present D7.4 is now to evaluate how these boundary layer schemes affect the representation of climate in the nextGEMS coupled systems. As in WP6 we find that the details of the boundary layer schemes do not much affect the existing biases so that the ultimate choice of the boundary layer schemes in both, atmosphere and ocean, are determined by practical considerations: future IFS simulations will continue to use K-profile theory to parameterize boundary layer turbulence and eddy-diffusive mass-flux to parameterize turbulence and cloud formation in the boundary layer. This is motivated by the high accuracy, a key objective for operational agencies like ECMWF. future ICON-A simulations will avoid physics parameterizations beyond the Smagorinsky closureto dissipate energy at the grid scale. This makes the model physics and dynamics transparentand turns ICON-A into an ideal research tool. future IFS-FESOM simulations will be done with the K-profile paramterization (KPP), becauseit provides a realistic 20th century increase in global temperatures. The alternative scheme, theTurbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE) parameterization mixes too much, which results in unrealistic20th century warming. future ICON-O simulation will be done with the TKE scheme for two reasons: it is energy based(rather than the empirical KPP), which allows easy combination with the abyssal mixing schemeIDEMIX, and KPP is licensed under GNU, which would limit further applications.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

D7.4: Report summarising the impact of the oceanic and atmospheric boundary layer schemes in the coupled system · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS