Dissertation Ownership in Doctoral Education: A Legal and Ethical Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Between Doctoral Candidates and Universities; A Case Study in Poland

Abstract The question of who owns a doctoral dissertation—the university or the doctoral candidate—remains a complex issue situated at the intersection of intellectual property law, academic governance, and research ethics. This paper examines the legal frameworks, university policies, scholarship agreements, and relevant case law that shape ownership claims over doctoral dissertations. Focusing on European and North American contexts, particularly Poland and the United States, it explores the distinction between moral and economic rights, and analyzes how scholarship contracts, internal regulations, and disciplinary proceedings impact the student’s ability to control their work. The study argues for greater transparency, legal clarity, and institutional accountability in defining the ownership and usage rights of doctoral dissertations. Keywords: Intellectual property rights, University regulations, Conflict of Interest, Student rights

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15195281
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dissertation Ownership in Doctoral Education: A Legal and Ethical Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Between Doctoral Candidates and Universities; A Case Study in Poland

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Dissertation Ownership in Doctoral Education: A Legal and Ethical Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Between Doctoral Candidates and Universities; A Case Study in Poland

article en

Abstract

Abstract The question of who owns a doctoral dissertation—the university or the doctoral candidate—remains a complex issue situated at the intersection of intellectual property law, academic governance, and research ethics. This paper examines the legal frameworks, university policies, scholarship agreements, and relevant case law that shape ownership claims over doctoral dissertations. Focusing on European and North American contexts, particularly Poland and the United States, it explores the distinction between moral and economic rights, and analyzes how scholarship contracts, internal regulations, and disciplinary proceedings impact the student’s ability to control their work. The study argues for greater transparency, legal clarity, and institutional accountability in defining the ownership and usage rights of doctoral dissertations. Keywords: Intellectual property rights, University regulations, Conflict of Interest, Student rights

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dissertation Ownership in Doctoral Education: A Legal and Ethical Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Between Doctoral Candidates and Universities; A Case Study in Poland · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS