Contagion of disrespect: Is there an inverse relation between gender parity and citation impact?

In a recent paper, Wong and Rubin (2024) introduce the concept of “contagion of disrespect”, where the presence of marginalized groups in research fields increases dismissal of research in such fields. In this ongoing study we explore this hypothesis in the case of the gender gap in science. Our objective is to determine whether this phenomenon is supported by quantitative evidence and identify specific topics for further qualitative analysis. We use a dataset of 46,565,404 publications linked to 26,003,448 authors from OpenAlex and apply a gender assignment algorithm based on open data sources. Here we present some preliminary findings based on visualization techniques, laying the groundwork for a more comprehensive exploration of gendered dynamics in scientific recognition. We aim at expanding our study introducing inferential and causal analysis to explore the impact of “contagion of disrespect” on gender inequalities in the scientific system.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15607534
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contagion of disrespect: Is there an inverse relation between gender parity and citation impact?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Contagion of disrespect: Is there an inverse relation between gender parity and citation impact?

article en

Abstract

In a recent paper, Wong and Rubin (2024) introduce the concept of “contagion of disrespect”, where the presence of marginalized groups in research fields increases dismissal of research in such fields. In this ongoing study we explore this hypothesis in the case of the gender gap in science. Our objective is to determine whether this phenomenon is supported by quantitative evidence and identify specific topics for further qualitative analysis. We use a dataset of 46,565,404 publications linked to 26,003,448 authors from OpenAlex and apply a gender assignment algorithm based on open data sources. Here we present some preliminary findings based on visualization techniques, laying the groundwork for a more comprehensive exploration of gendered dynamics in scientific recognition. We aim at expanding our study introducing inferential and causal analysis to explore the impact of “contagion of disrespect” on gender inequalities in the scientific system.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad de Granada (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.