Comparison of Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks in The Estimation Of Thermal Conductivity Mild Steel Tig Weld

Thermal conductivity is a measure of heat flow per second per unit area per temperature gradient. This study compared Response surface Methodology to Artificial Neural Networks in the opitimisation of the thermal conductivity of mild steel weld using the TIG welding process, The input parameters considered in this study were welding current, welding voltage and gas flow rate, while the measured parameters was thermal conductivity. Twenty sets of experiment were performed using 5 specimens for each run. The plate samples were 60 mm long with a wall thickness of 10mm. The models RSM R2 value for RSM was 92.38% and ANN 99.85%. This shows that ANN is a better predictor as compared to RSM.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15204453
Primary Topic
Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks in The Estimation Of Thermal Conductivity Mild Steel Tig Weld

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
article

Comparison of Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks in The Estimation Of Thermal Conductivity Mild Steel Tig Weld

article en

Abstract

Thermal conductivity is a measure of heat flow per second per unit area per temperature gradient. This study compared Response surface Methodology to Artificial Neural Networks in the opitimisation of the thermal conductivity of mild steel weld using the TIG welding process, The input parameters considered in this study were welding current, welding voltage and gas flow rate, while the measured parameters was thermal conductivity. Twenty sets of experiment were performed using 5 specimens for each run. The plate samples were 60 mm long with a wall thickness of 10mm. The models RSM R2 value for RSM was 92.38% and ANN 99.85%. This shows that ANN is a better predictor as compared to RSM.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.