Camptomorpha undetermined

A PICTORIAL KEY TO CAMPTOMORPHA SPECIES, BASEDON GONOPODAL STRUCTURE 1. Prefemoral process (PfP) equal or subequal in length to acropodite (A) (Fig. 4D–F)........................................... 2 – Prefemoral process (PfP) conspicuously longer than acropodite (A) (Fig. 9B–D) ..................................................... 7 2. Prefemoral process (PfP) with at least two acute projections at mesal margin (Figs 1B, 5B)...................................... 3 – Prefemoral process (PfP) without well-developed projections at mesal margin (Figs 2C, 6B)...................................... 4 3. Apex of acropodite (A) with a triangular projection (Fig. 5C) .................................................................... C. Orites – Apex of acropodite (A) divided into two acuminate branches (Fig. 1B–C).................................................. C. AberrAns 4. Mesal apical margin of prefemoral process (PfP) conspicuously irregular, with indentations and a digitiform projection near its middle (Fig. 2C) ............................................... 5 – Mesal apicaI margin of prefemoral process (PfP) regular, with neither indentations nor a digitiform projection (Figs 4F, 6B) .......................................................................... 6 5. Digitiform projection at mesal margin of prefemoral process (PfP) regular, without indentations (Fig. 7B–D)............ ..................................................................... C. pApillOsA – Digitiform projection at mesal margin of prefemoral process (PfP) irregular, with small indentations (Fig. 2C).......... ......................................................................... C. atypha 6. Solenomere branch (sl) bipartite (Fig. 6B) .......... C. Ortizi – Solenomere (sl) a single branch (Fig. 4D)........ C. dOrsAlis 7. Prefemoral process (PfP) with only a single lateral projection (Fig. 9B–D)................................................................... 8 – Prefemoral process (PfP) with at least two lateral projections (Fig. 3D–E) ................................................................. 10 8. Apex of prefemoral process (PfP) deeply divided into two branches (Fig. 9C) ............................................ C. titAnA – Apex of prefemoral process (PfP) either weakly divided or not divided (Fig. 11B)................................................... 9 9. Prefemoral process (PfP) bipartite, divided into two subequal branches (Fig. 11B–E) ............................... C. weyrAucHi – Prefemoral process (PfP) bipartite, but button-shaped at apex and divided into two branches of different size, both spiniform and one (d) being significantlY more stronglY developed than spine b (Fig. 12J–M). C. HOffmAni sp.n. 10. Apex of prefemoral process (PfP) strongly directed basally (Fig. 8B–D) ................................................................ 11 – Apex of prefemoral process (PfP) only slightly directed basally (Fig. 3D)................................................ C. digitAtA 11. Prefemoral process (PfP) bipartite, apical part being subsecuriform and middle one with a strong, unequallY bifid spine (Fig. 10B–D) .................................. C. tOcAcHensis – Prefemoral process (PfP) more simple, a single branch with an acuminate unciform apex and two smaller, similarly unciform, lateral processes (Fig. 8B–D)..... C. pulvillAtA