What Are Physical Assistant Robots? A Rapid Evidence Review to Make a Case for Clearer Definitions

Physical Assistant Robots (PAR(s)) are increasingly ubiquitous robots that assist humans with various physical tasks, including walking, eating and dressing. However, there is lack of definitional clarity when it comes to PARs, with ambiguity as to how these robots are construed. This results in potential issues for user safety and for manufacturers’ liability. Employing a rapid evidence review, this paper highlights the discrepancies associated with the understanding of PARs in the literature, and shows the lack of consensus regarding the meaning of PARs. The preliminary results indicate the wider ramifications that these discrepancies can cause in terms of safety for users and regulatory compliances for manufacturers. The authors conclude by advocating for a clearer understanding of PARs to ensure necessary safeguards, and by outlining how further research will be conducted to this end.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15683382
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Are Physical Assistant Robots? A Rapid Evidence Review to Make a Case for Clearer Definitions

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

What Are Physical Assistant Robots? A Rapid Evidence Review to Make a Case for Clearer Definitions

article en

Abstract

Physical Assistant Robots (PAR(s)) are increasingly ubiquitous robots that assist humans with various physical tasks, including walking, eating and dressing. However, there is lack of definitional clarity when it comes to PARs, with ambiguity as to how these robots are construed. This results in potential issues for user safety and for manufacturers’ liability. Employing a rapid evidence review, this paper highlights the discrepancies associated with the understanding of PARs in the literature, and shows the lack of consensus regarding the meaning of PARs. The preliminary results indicate the wider ramifications that these discrepancies can cause in terms of safety for users and regulatory compliances for manufacturers. The authors conclude by advocating for a clearer understanding of PARs to ensure necessary safeguards, and by outlining how further research will be conducted to this end.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Leiden University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.