Towards Explainable AI for Government Workers

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is essential for transparency, fairness, and accountability in government decision-making. Unlike commercial or healthcare AI, government AI operates in a high-stakes regulatory and political environment, directly impacting public trust and democratic governance. However, the lack of explainability in these systems poses serious risks, enabling manipulation, erosion of civil service integrity, and reduced accountability. Recent critiques of anti-expertise movements highlight how AI can either enhance democratic governance or obscure accountability. Given its role in national security, social services, and policymaking, XAI is not just a technical necessity but a fundamental safeguard against unchecked automation and political misuse. Explainable AI ensures that civil servants, policymakers, and citizens can trust and contest AI-driven decisions, reinforcing fairness, oversight, and agency. This paper argues for the urgent need to develop XAI frameworks tailored to government applications. We examine how government AI differs from other domains, why existing XAI research falls short, and how new frameworks can mitigate the risks of opaque AI in public institutions. By prioritizing explainability, we ensure AI serves the people, upholds democratic integrity, and strengthens—rather than undermines—public governance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15170505
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Explainable AI for Government Workers

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Towards Explainable AI for Government Workers

article en

Abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is essential for transparency, fairness, and accountability in government decision-making. Unlike commercial or healthcare AI, government AI operates in a high-stakes regulatory and political environment, directly impacting public trust and democratic governance. However, the lack of explainability in these systems poses serious risks, enabling manipulation, erosion of civil service integrity, and reduced accountability. Recent critiques of anti-expertise movements highlight how AI can either enhance democratic governance or obscure accountability. Given its role in national security, social services, and policymaking, XAI is not just a technical necessity but a fundamental safeguard against unchecked automation and political misuse. Explainable AI ensures that civil servants, policymakers, and citizens can trust and contest AI-driven decisions, reinforcing fairness, oversight, and agency. This paper argues for the urgent need to develop XAI frameworks tailored to government applications. We examine how government AI differs from other domains, why existing XAI research falls short, and how new frameworks can mitigate the risks of opaque AI in public institutions. By prioritizing explainability, we ensure AI serves the people, upholds democratic integrity, and strengthens—rather than undermines—public governance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.