A Leave-One-Out Approach to Evaluating Producers' Commodity Dependent Impact Scores on a Non-Calibrated Survey

This paper presents a novel application of the leave-one-out (LOO) methodology to evaluate the impact of individual records on national agricultural estimates produced based on non-calibrated surveys. Using the July 2020 Cattle Survey as a case study in our analysis, it is demonstrated how impact scores generated through the LOO approach can be employed in conjunction with response propensity scores to reduce sample size without significantly affecting the accuracy of estimates. Our findings indicate that strategic sample reductions can enhance resource efficiency in large-scale agricultural surveys and mitigate bias introduced by non-response through targeted imputation. This study contributes to the broader discussion on improving the cost-effectiveness of agricultural data collection while preserving statistical rigor.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14003781
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Leave-One-Out Approach to Evaluating Producers' Commodity Dependent Impact Scores on a Non-Calibrated Survey

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

A Leave-One-Out Approach to Evaluating Producers' Commodity Dependent Impact Scores on a Non-Calibrated Survey

article en

Abstract

This paper presents a novel application of the leave-one-out (LOO) methodology to evaluate the impact of individual records on national agricultural estimates produced based on non-calibrated surveys. Using the July 2020 Cattle Survey as a case study in our analysis, it is demonstrated how impact scores generated through the LOO approach can be employed in conjunction with response propensity scores to reduce sample size without significantly affecting the accuracy of estimates. Our findings indicate that strategic sample reductions can enhance resource efficiency in large-scale agricultural surveys and mitigate bias introduced by non-response through targeted imputation. This study contributes to the broader discussion on improving the cost-effectiveness of agricultural data collection while preserving statistical rigor.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
National Agricultural Statistics Service (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.