Cooperative Principle in Political Interviews

This study aimed to determine whether the maxims of quantity, quality, relevance, and manner, which comprise the cooperative principle, were observed by the five key contenders in the 2022 presidential elections in the Philippines. This study employed descriptive research as its design and pragmatic analysis as its method of investigating the observance of the cooperative principle in political interviews. The transcribed interview responses of the politicians constituted the data of this study. Frequency, percentage, and rank were used to determine which maxims were frequently observed, flouted, infringed, suspended, violated, and opted out. The results reveal that the frequently observed maxim was relevance, while the flouted maxim was quantity. No maxim was infringed, suspended, violated, or opted out by the presidential candidates. This study concludes that the politicians attempted to give pertinent information but needed to provide the exact amount of information during the interviews. This could mean that the information could have been more general or that specific data for comprehensive understanding may have been omitted, purposefully or unintentionally, leading to an incomplete picture.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15348068
Primary Topic
Impact of Education Environments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cooperative Principle in Political Interviews

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Impact of Education Environments
article

Cooperative Principle in Political Interviews

article en

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether the maxims of quantity, quality, relevance, and manner, which comprise the cooperative principle, were observed by the five key contenders in the 2022 presidential elections in the Philippines. This study employed descriptive research as its design and pragmatic analysis as its method of investigating the observance of the cooperative principle in political interviews. The transcribed interview responses of the politicians constituted the data of this study. Frequency, percentage, and rank were used to determine which maxims were frequently observed, flouted, infringed, suspended, violated, and opted out. The results reveal that the frequently observed maxim was relevance, while the flouted maxim was quantity. No maxim was infringed, suspended, violated, or opted out by the presidential candidates. This study concludes that the politicians attempted to give pertinent information but needed to provide the exact amount of information during the interviews. This could mean that the information could have been more general or that specific data for comprehensive understanding may have been omitted, purposefully or unintentionally, leading to an incomplete picture.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Carlos Hilado Memorial State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Impact of Education Environments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.