Commitment Level of Teachers as Correlates to their Teaching Performance: Inputs for a Training Program

This study investigated the relationship between teachers' commitment levels and their teaching performance as a basis for designing a training program for the school year 2023-2024. Specifically, the study aimed to understand teachers' perceptions regarding the factors influencing their commitment, classified into affective, continuous, and normative commitment. It also sought to determine if there were significant differences in respondents' perceptions across these commitment dimensions. Key findings revealed that teachers generally held a positive perception of their commitment levels, reflected in a grand weighted mean of 3.64, corresponding to a verbal interpretation of "Strongly Agree." In terms of teaching performance, teachers' ratings from the school year 2022-2023 averaged 4.33, rated as "Very Satisfactory" based on individual performance commitment and review forms. However, statistical analysis showed no significant relationship between teachers’ commitment levels and their performance ratings, indicating that while teachers felt strongly committed, this did not necessarily correlate with measurable teaching performance outcomes. These findings suggest that factors influencing commitment may not directly impact performance, highlighting the need for targeted professional development that addresses both commitment and other performance-enhancing areas. The study's insights could inform the development of a more nuanced training program tailored to support teachers' holistic growth and effectiveness.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14048381
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commitment Level of Teachers as Correlates to their Teaching Performance: Inputs for a Training Program

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Teacher Education and Assessments
article

Commitment Level of Teachers as Correlates to their Teaching Performance: Inputs for a Training Program

article en

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between teachers' commitment levels and their teaching performance as a basis for designing a training program for the school year 2023-2024. Specifically, the study aimed to understand teachers' perceptions regarding the factors influencing their commitment, classified into affective, continuous, and normative commitment. It also sought to determine if there were significant differences in respondents' perceptions across these commitment dimensions. Key findings revealed that teachers generally held a positive perception of their commitment levels, reflected in a grand weighted mean of 3.64, corresponding to a verbal interpretation of "Strongly Agree." In terms of teaching performance, teachers' ratings from the school year 2022-2023 averaged 4.33, rated as "Very Satisfactory" based on individual performance commitment and review forms. However, statistical analysis showed no significant relationship between teachers’ commitment levels and their performance ratings, indicating that while teachers felt strongly committed, this did not necessarily correlate with measurable teaching performance outcomes. These findings suggest that factors influencing commitment may not directly impact performance, highlighting the need for targeted professional development that addresses both commitment and other performance-enhancing areas. The study's insights could inform the development of a more nuanced training program tailored to support teachers' holistic growth and effectiveness.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
De La Salle Lipa (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Teacher Education and Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.