Trichoporus persimilis Ashmead 1908

Trichoporus persimilis Ashmead, 1908 nomen nudum Irichoporus persimilis Ashmead, 1908 (in Rocha 1908: 70, misspelling), not Trichoporus persimilis Ashmead, 1904. Rocha (1918: 21, nomen nudum, checklist, misspelling). Tricophorus perssimilis Ashmead: Rocha (1950: 292, checklist, biology, misspelling). Tetrastichus (Exurus) perssimilis (Ashmead): Silva (1973: 109, checklist, combination, biology, misspelling). Remarks. Rocha (1908, 1918) misspelled the generic epithet Trichoporus as Irichoporus. The change from the letter “T” to an “I” was also done with the common genus Tetrastichus (cited as Ietrastichus) when the author cited T. balteativentris (see below). Rocha (1950) misspelled both generic and specific epithets when citing present species as Tricophorus perssimilis. Also, he reported the species as“parasites of cecidomyiid larvae from Myrtaceae and Rutaceae galls” (translated from p. 292). Ashmead (1904) described Trichoporus persimilis (now Galeopsomyia persimilis, after LaSalle and Shauff 1992) from Chapada (Chapada dos Guimarães, state of Mato Grosso, Brazil), as reported in the original description and on the lectotype labels (available at USDA/ARS 2016). Except by the same specific epithet, there is no other evidence that the species cited by Rocha (1908) is the same as the species of Ashmead (1904).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14704020
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trichoporus persimilis Ashmead 1908

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Trichoporus persimilis Ashmead 1908

article en

Abstract

Trichoporus persimilis Ashmead, 1908 nomen nudum Irichoporus persimilis Ashmead, 1908 (in Rocha 1908: 70, misspelling), not Trichoporus persimilis Ashmead, 1904. Rocha (1918: 21, nomen nudum, checklist, misspelling). Tricophorus perssimilis Ashmead: Rocha (1950: 292, checklist, biology, misspelling). Tetrastichus (Exurus) perssimilis (Ashmead): Silva (1973: 109, checklist, combination, biology, misspelling). Remarks. Rocha (1908, 1918) misspelled the generic epithet Trichoporus as Irichoporus. The change from the letter “T” to an “I” was also done with the common genus Tetrastichus (cited as Ietrastichus) when the author cited T. balteativentris (see below). Rocha (1950) misspelled both generic and specific epithets when citing present species as Tricophorus perssimilis. Also, he reported the species as“parasites of cecidomyiid larvae from Myrtaceae and Rutaceae galls” (translated from p. 292). Ashmead (1904) described Trichoporus persimilis (now Galeopsomyia persimilis, after LaSalle and Shauff 1992) from Chapada (Chapada dos Guimarães, state of Mato Grosso, Brazil), as reported in the original description and on the lectotype labels (available at USDA/ARS 2016). Except by the same specific epithet, there is no other evidence that the species cited by Rocha (1908) is the same as the species of Ashmead (1904).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Instituto Biológico (BR), University of Padua (IT), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.