IMPROVEMENT OF SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN ANOPHTHALMIA

Anophthalmia, resulting from the surgical removal of the eyeball (enucleation or evisceration), remains a serious medical and psychosocial problem worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and Vision 2020 initiative, over 55 million people sustain ocular injuries annually, leading to blindness in 1.6 million patients (Foster A., Vision 2020). Despite advances in ophthalmology, enucleation remains one of the most commonly performed ocular surgeries, particularly in cases of trauma, inflammation, and malignancy. In Russia alone, up to 8,000 enucleations are performed annually due to severe trauma (Gundorova R.A. et al., 1994). Anophthalmic patients frequently experience significant psychological distress, functional limitations, and cosmetic disfigurement, which negatively affect their social integration and quality of life. It is reported that 80% of patients with anophthalmia are dissatisfied with their appearance and prosthetic outcomes, leading to reduced self-esteem and avoidance of social interactions (Haralampidi M.P., 2002). A major challenge in the management of anophthalmia is the formation of a stable, functional, and aesthetically acceptable orbital stump capable of supporting a mobile and well-positioned ocular prosthesis. However, modern surgical methods and implant materials still demonstrate limitations, achieving satisfactory results in only 20–25% of cases (Gundorova R.A. et al., 2009). Poor outcomes are often associated with incomplete formation of the motility-supporting complex, restricted prosthesis mobility, eyelid deformities, and socket contracture. Recent studies (Sorokina I.A., 2005; Beraya M.Z., 2006; Lavrentieva N.V., 2013) emphasize the importance of individualized surgical planning based on comprehensive assessment of the orbital stump, as well as the use of biointegrative implants to improve functional and cosmetic results. Moreover, the concept of quality of life has become a critical outcome measure in ophthalmic surgery, encompassing not only physical and visual parameters but also psychological and social well-being (WHO, 1993). This study aimed to improve surgical management in anophthalmia by developing standardized criteria for orbital stump evaluation, refining surgical indications, and conducting a comparative analysis of reconstructive techniques in order to optimize prosthetic outcomes and enhance patients’ quality of life.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520785
Primary Topic
Ocular Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPROVEMENT OF SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN ANOPHTHALMIA

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ocular Disorders and Treatments
article

IMPROVEMENT OF SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN ANOPHTHALMIA

article en

Abstract

Anophthalmia, resulting from the surgical removal of the eyeball (enucleation or evisceration), remains a serious medical and psychosocial problem worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and Vision 2020 initiative, over 55 million people sustain ocular injuries annually, leading to blindness in 1.6 million patients (Foster A., Vision 2020). Despite advances in ophthalmology, enucleation remains one of the most commonly performed ocular surgeries, particularly in cases of trauma, inflammation, and malignancy. In Russia alone, up to 8,000 enucleations are performed annually due to severe trauma (Gundorova R.A. et al., 1994). Anophthalmic patients frequently experience significant psychological distress, functional limitations, and cosmetic disfigurement, which negatively affect their social integration and quality of life. It is reported that 80% of patients with anophthalmia are dissatisfied with their appearance and prosthetic outcomes, leading to reduced self-esteem and avoidance of social interactions (Haralampidi M.P., 2002). A major challenge in the management of anophthalmia is the formation of a stable, functional, and aesthetically acceptable orbital stump capable of supporting a mobile and well-positioned ocular prosthesis. However, modern surgical methods and implant materials still demonstrate limitations, achieving satisfactory results in only 20–25% of cases (Gundorova R.A. et al., 2009). Poor outcomes are often associated with incomplete formation of the motility-supporting complex, restricted prosthesis mobility, eyelid deformities, and socket contracture. Recent studies (Sorokina I.A., 2005; Beraya M.Z., 2006; Lavrentieva N.V., 2013) emphasize the importance of individualized surgical planning based on comprehensive assessment of the orbital stump, as well as the use of biointegrative implants to improve functional and cosmetic results. Moreover, the concept of quality of life has become a critical outcome measure in ophthalmic surgery, encompassing not only physical and visual parameters but also psychological and social well-being (WHO, 1993). This study aimed to improve surgical management in anophthalmia by developing standardized criteria for orbital stump evaluation, refining surgical indications, and conducting a comparative analysis of reconstructive techniques in order to optimize prosthetic outcomes and enhance patients’ quality of life.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Foundation for Professional Development (ZA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Ocular Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.