D2.1 Extended version: Benchmark for integration of biodiversity in Environmental Assessment Instruments, including chapter on test at 200 EAs from Denmark, Germany, Spain and Portugal

This benchmark reported is carried out in line with the purposes of the BioValue project. The specific purpose of the benchmark is to: A. Identify the current best practice guidance of integrating biodiversity into EAI especially related to spatial planning (the main purpose of this report). B. Compare the current best practice guidance to the current actual practice with the aim of improving the practice (comparison that will be made in Task 2.2). C. Establish an improved best practice guidance. This report documents the first part of the benchmark exercise relating to the first part of the purpose (A). Here, a benchmark is derived from twelve guidance documents focussed on biodiversity in EAI (task 2.1). The guidance documents are reviewed based on a framework of questions that are a mix of open and closed questions allowing for both structured and more grounded analysis (see table 4). Based on this, a benchmark is developed, which consists of closed questions allowing for a structured and quantitative analysis of a large number of EIA and SEA reports (task 2.2, (B). The structured and quantitative analysis is reported in the new chapter 6 in this extended version of the deliverable. Based on this and the gap analysis of task 2.4, the benchmark will be revisited, and relevant revisions will be made based on finding in literature and practice. In the later stages in the BioValue project, this will, together with knowledge from other parts of the project be used for development of a transformed practice (C). It is relevant to mention that this last part of the purpose goes beyond the definition of benchmarking by Bhutta and Huq (1999), as the BioValue project is not only concerned with development to reach the current best practice but to push much further, towards defining a new transformed practice.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13736201
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

D2.1 Extended version: Benchmark for integration of biodiversity in Environmental Assessment Instruments, including chapter on test at 200 EAs from Denmark, Germany, Spain and Portugal

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

D2.1 Extended version: Benchmark for integration of biodiversity in Environmental Assessment Instruments, including chapter on test at 200 EAs from Denmark, Germany, Spain and Portugal

article en

Abstract

This benchmark reported is carried out in line with the purposes of the BioValue project. The specific purpose of the benchmark is to: A. Identify the current best practice guidance of integrating biodiversity into EAI especially related to spatial planning (the main purpose of this report). B. Compare the current best practice guidance to the current actual practice with the aim of improving the practice (comparison that will be made in Task 2.2). C. Establish an improved best practice guidance. This report documents the first part of the benchmark exercise relating to the first part of the purpose (A). Here, a benchmark is derived from twelve guidance documents focussed on biodiversity in EAI (task 2.1). The guidance documents are reviewed based on a framework of questions that are a mix of open and closed questions allowing for both structured and more grounded analysis (see table 4). Based on this, a benchmark is developed, which consists of closed questions allowing for a structured and quantitative analysis of a large number of EIA and SEA reports (task 2.2, (B). The structured and quantitative analysis is reported in the new chapter 6 in this extended version of the deliverable. Based on this and the gap analysis of task 2.4, the benchmark will be revisited, and relevant revisions will be made based on finding in literature and practice. In the later stages in the BioValue project, this will, together with knowledge from other parts of the project be used for development of a transformed practice (C). It is relevant to mention that this last part of the purpose goes beyond the definition of benchmarking by Bhutta and Huq (1999), as the BioValue project is not only concerned with development to reach the current best practice but to push much further, towards defining a new transformed practice.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Trento (IT), Megmilk Snow Brand (Japan) (JP), Instituto Superior Técnico (PT), Aalborg University (DK)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.