A Mathematical Neutrosophic Offset Framework with Upside-Down Logics for Quality Evaluation of Multi-Sensor Intelligent Vehicle Environment Perception Systems

The accuracy and reliability of intelligent vehicle perception systems significantly depend on the quality of data integration across multiple sensors operating in uncertain and contradictory environments. Traditional fusion models are often constrained by rigid logic systems and limited by probabilistic bounds, making them inadequate in dynamic or ambiguous contexts. This paper introduces a novel mathematical framework that combines Neutrosophic Offset Theory with Upside-Down Logics to evaluate and enhance the perception quality of autonomous systems. The proposed model allows sensor readings to exceed the conventional membership bounds [0,1], accommodating over-determined or negative-impact inputs through offset membership values. Moreover, by applying upside-down logic reasoning, we reinterpret contradictory sensor data within a broader logical spectrum. A set of mathematical definitions, operators, and formulations are presented, along with a complete case study simulating an urban driving scenario with conflicting sensor outputs. The framework quantitatively assesses perception quality using neutrosophic scores and shows enhanced robustness against uncertain, biased, or paradoxical information. The results confirm that the integration of offset-based neutrosophy and upside-down logic provides a flexible, logically consistent, and mathematically sound approach to perception quality analysis in intelligent vehicle systems.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15758624
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mathematical Neutrosophic Offset Framework with Upside-Down Logics for Quality Evaluation of Multi-Sensor Intelligent Vehicle Environment Perception Systems

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A Mathematical Neutrosophic Offset Framework with Upside-Down Logics for Quality Evaluation of Multi-Sensor Intelligent Vehicle Environment Perception Systems

article en

Abstract

The accuracy and reliability of intelligent vehicle perception systems significantly depend on the quality of data integration across multiple sensors operating in uncertain and contradictory environments. Traditional fusion models are often constrained by rigid logic systems and limited by probabilistic bounds, making them inadequate in dynamic or ambiguous contexts. This paper introduces a novel mathematical framework that combines Neutrosophic Offset Theory with Upside-Down Logics to evaluate and enhance the perception quality of autonomous systems. The proposed model allows sensor readings to exceed the conventional membership bounds [0,1], accommodating over-determined or negative-impact inputs through offset membership values. Moreover, by applying upside-down logic reasoning, we reinterpret contradictory sensor data within a broader logical spectrum. A set of mathematical definitions, operators, and formulations are presented, along with a complete case study simulating an urban driving scenario with conflicting sensor outputs. The framework quantitatively assesses perception quality using neutrosophic scores and shows enhanced robustness against uncertain, biased, or paradoxical information. The results confirm that the integration of offset-based neutrosophy and upside-down logic provides a flexible, logically consistent, and mathematically sound approach to perception quality analysis in intelligent vehicle systems.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.