Interpreting and Extending the Maximum Ratio Test of Unacceptability

Tsao and Wright (1983) proposes the use of a statistic called the “maximum ratio” to assess the reliability of K estimates of an unknown population parameter θ. This statistic can be used to test whether one of these estimates is outside of an “acceptable” region, whose radius is a multiple α of the unknown true parameter θ. Because θ is unknown, it is difficult to know whether a large α value reflects a large error in the underlying metric, or just a large proportion of a small θ. This paper generalizes the maximum ratio test to multiple dimensions, considers some broad approaches for selecting an α value for this test in the absence of knowledge of θ, applies the testto five estimates of the population proportions for eight demographic subgroups within the United States, and visualizes the results. We then repeat the process after intentionally introducing errors into one of the estimates. This paper is abridged from Hall (2024).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13935802
Primary Topic
Census and Population Estimation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting and Extending the Maximum Ratio Test of Unacceptability

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Census and Population Estimation
article

Interpreting and Extending the Maximum Ratio Test of Unacceptability

article en

Abstract

Tsao and Wright (1983) proposes the use of a statistic called the “maximum ratio” to assess the reliability of K estimates of an unknown population parameter θ. This statistic can be used to test whether one of these estimates is outside of an “acceptable” region, whose radius is a multiple α of the unknown true parameter θ. Because θ is unknown, it is difficult to know whether a large α value reflects a large error in the underlying metric, or just a large proportion of a small θ. This paper generalizes the maximum ratio test to multiple dimensions, considers some broad approaches for selecting an α value for this test in the absence of knowledge of θ, applies the testto five estimates of the population proportions for eight demographic subgroups within the United States, and visualizes the results. We then repeat the process after intentionally introducing errors into one of the estimates. This paper is abridged from Hall (2024).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
United States Census Bureau (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Census and Population Estimation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.