DIASPORA FINANCE, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND TRADE FLOWS IN THE BRICS COUNTRIES

Abstract The literature suggests demonstrable links between the presence of diaspora and increased trade just as countries are increasingly mobilising more diaspora finance to improve investment and trade. This paper deployed ARDL model to determine the effects of DIF and FDI on trade in the BRICS countries for 42 years (1980 – 2022). Results show heterogeneous short-run effects of DIF and FDI on trade in BRICS. Similarly, there are mixed long-run effects for Brazil, China and South Africa but not be ascertained for Russia and India. The implication is that DIF and FDI are appropriate strategies for short-run export growth and import control in the BRICS countries but are not appropriate for long-run export-oriented policy in Russia and import-control strategies in Russia, China, India and South Africa. In practice, therefore, the countries should incorporate diaspora finance and FDI only in their short-run export-growth and import control strategies, while only Brazil should do so in both the short- and long-run in order to benefit more from trade. KEYWORDS: Diaspora finance, FDI, trade, exchange rate, absorptive capacity, ARDL, BRICS

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14679415
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIASPORA FINANCE, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND TRADE FLOWS IN THE BRICS COUNTRIES

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
International Business and FDI
article

DIASPORA FINANCE, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND TRADE FLOWS IN THE BRICS COUNTRIES

article en

Abstract

Abstract The literature suggests demonstrable links between the presence of diaspora and increased trade just as countries are increasingly mobilising more diaspora finance to improve investment and trade. This paper deployed ARDL model to determine the effects of DIF and FDI on trade in the BRICS countries for 42 years (1980 – 2022). Results show heterogeneous short-run effects of DIF and FDI on trade in BRICS. Similarly, there are mixed long-run effects for Brazil, China and South Africa but not be ascertained for Russia and India. The implication is that DIF and FDI are appropriate strategies for short-run export growth and import control in the BRICS countries but are not appropriate for long-run export-oriented policy in Russia and import-control strategies in Russia, China, India and South Africa. In practice, therefore, the countries should incorporate diaspora finance and FDI only in their short-run export-growth and import control strategies, while only Brazil should do so in both the short- and long-run in order to benefit more from trade. KEYWORDS: Diaspora finance, FDI, trade, exchange rate, absorptive capacity, ARDL, BRICS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
International Business and FDI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.