COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN LOAD DISTRIBUTION METHODS ON STRAIGHT BRIDGE DECKS WITH VARIATION IN THE NUMBER OF CROSSBEAMS - OPEN SECTION SUPERSTRUCTURE

This work's objective is to analyze and dimension of Reinforced Concrete stringers using the Engesser-Courbon Method for moving loads and the Yield Line Theory, Areas of Influence and Grid Method for determining permanent loads. It also to evaluate the influence of the number and stiffness of crossbeams on load distribution. With the research, concluded that the Areas of Influence method has shown to be more effective on decks with high crossbeams stiffness. The Yield Line Theory offered more accurate results compared to the Areas of Influence Method. The number of crossbeams was what most impacted the difference in steel areas between the decks. When the crossbeams numbers went from 4 to 5 and from 5 to 6, there was a reduction in the steel areas of the reinforcements by 25%, 35% and 40% on average, between the steel areas of the vertical stirrups positive and negative longitudinal reinforcements respectively.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14824211
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN LOAD DISTRIBUTION METHODS ON STRAIGHT BRIDGE DECKS WITH VARIATION IN THE NUMBER OF CROSSBEAMS - OPEN SECTION SUPERSTRUCTURE

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN LOAD DISTRIBUTION METHODS ON STRAIGHT BRIDGE DECKS WITH VARIATION IN THE NUMBER OF CROSSBEAMS - OPEN SECTION SUPERSTRUCTURE

article en

Abstract

This work's objective is to analyze and dimension of Reinforced Concrete stringers using the Engesser-Courbon Method for moving loads and the Yield Line Theory, Areas of Influence and Grid Method for determining permanent loads. It also to evaluate the influence of the number and stiffness of crossbeams on load distribution. With the research, concluded that the Areas of Influence method has shown to be more effective on decks with high crossbeams stiffness. The Yield Line Theory offered more accurate results compared to the Areas of Influence Method. The number of crossbeams was what most impacted the difference in steel areas between the decks. When the crossbeams numbers went from 4 to 5 and from 5 to 6, there was a reduction in the steel areas of the reinforcements by 25%, 35% and 40% on average, between the steel areas of the vertical stirrups positive and negative longitudinal reinforcements respectively.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (BR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.