Crowd-Sourcing or AI-Sourcing? The Impact of GenAI on Data Annotation Tasks

Generative AI (GenAI) and its capabilities have led people of various professions to consider how expendable their jobs are. Meanwhile, others see an opportunity to maximize productivity, using GenAI to reduce their time and effort. Crowd workers are no exception; experimental evidence and workers’ testimonies concur that GenAI tools, especially ChatGPT, are being used in the completion of tasks. With this in mind, one is left to wonder if this is the end of “true” human annotations, and if so, if it even matters. We predict that the future of data annotation will be characterized by a spectrum of human-AI collaboration modes, ranging from tasks performed only by GenAI, to those requiring human-AI collaboration, to those that will be more efficient if they remain human-driven.We also foresee that a potential negative effect of the uncritical adoption of GenAI for annotation, will be the decreased diversity in resulting labels, which may not represent the views of all.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14904343
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crowd-Sourcing or AI-Sourcing? The Impact of GenAI on Data Annotation Tasks

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Crowd-Sourcing or AI-Sourcing? The Impact of GenAI on Data Annotation Tasks

article en

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) and its capabilities have led people of various professions to consider how expendable their jobs are. Meanwhile, others see an opportunity to maximize productivity, using GenAI to reduce their time and effort. Crowd workers are no exception; experimental evidence and workers’ testimonies concur that GenAI tools, especially ChatGPT, are being used in the completion of tasks. With this in mind, one is left to wonder if this is the end of “true” human annotations, and if so, if it even matters. We predict that the future of data annotation will be characterized by a spectrum of human-AI collaboration modes, ranging from tasks performed only by GenAI, to those requiring human-AI collaboration, to those that will be more efficient if they remain human-driven.We also foresee that a potential negative effect of the uncritical adoption of GenAI for annotation, will be the decreased diversity in resulting labels, which may not represent the views of all.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
The University of Queensland (AU), Open University of Cyprus (CY)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crowd-Sourcing or AI-Sourcing? The Impact of GenAI on Data Annotation Tasks · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS