The postdigital turn, the GenAI hype, and quality teaching and learning: What is the place of critical thinking and what can we do to promote it?

Abstract: As digital technologies become seamlessly embedded in everyday life, distinctions between tools and human practices collapse, raising critical questions about the future of education and the place of critical thinking within it. While generative artificial intelligence offers powerful new capabilities, its widespread adoption risks reducing intellectual engagement to surface-level outputs, simulating criticality without genuine understanding. Drawing on postdigital theory and critical pedagogy, this reflection paper argues for a reassertion of critical thinking as an embodied, dialogic, and ethical practice. The analysis also considers the evolving notion of postdigital citizenship, emphasizing the need for learners to navigate not only digital tools, but also the social, political, and ideological systems they enact. Ultimately, the paper calls for educational practices that promote meaningful, critical engagement with AI, viewing learners not as passive recipients of machine-generated knowledge but as active participants in shaping democratic, just, and thoughtful futures.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16741149
Primary Topic
Marine and Coastal Ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The postdigital turn, the GenAI hype, and quality teaching and learning: What is the place of critical thinking and what can we do to promote it?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Marine and Coastal Ecosystems
article

The postdigital turn, the GenAI hype, and quality teaching and learning: What is the place of critical thinking and what can we do to promote it?

article en

Abstract

Abstract: As digital technologies become seamlessly embedded in everyday life, distinctions between tools and human practices collapse, raising critical questions about the future of education and the place of critical thinking within it. While generative artificial intelligence offers powerful new capabilities, its widespread adoption risks reducing intellectual engagement to surface-level outputs, simulating criticality without genuine understanding. Drawing on postdigital theory and critical pedagogy, this reflection paper argues for a reassertion of critical thinking as an embodied, dialogic, and ethical practice. The analysis also considers the evolving notion of postdigital citizenship, emphasizing the need for learners to navigate not only digital tools, but also the social, political, and ideological systems they enact. Ultimately, the paper calls for educational practices that promote meaningful, critical engagement with AI, viewing learners not as passive recipients of machine-generated knowledge but as active participants in shaping democratic, just, and thoughtful futures.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Marine and Coastal Ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.