Navigating Equity and Prosperity: A Deep Dive into the Supreme Court's 2024 Decision on SC/ST Reservation Policies

The Supreme Court of India’s 2024 decision to extend the creamy layer exclusion to ScheduledCastes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) has sparked a profound reevaluation of affirmative action’spurpose in the Indian context. This paper offers a detailed critique of the ruling, exploring whethereconomic advancement should serve as a yardstick for determining eligibility for caste-based reservations.It argues that by emphasizing economic criteria, the Court risks undermining the foundational goal ofaffirmative action: the eradication of systemic caste-based exclusion. Drawing on landmark judgmentssuch as Indra Sawhney v. Union of India and E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh, this analysishighlights the tensions between economic upliftment and social justice, suggesting that the 2024 rulingintroduces inconsistencies into the legal framework governing reservations. The paper advocates acomprehensive approach that integrates both social and economic dimensions while preserving thetransformative ethos of India’s constitutional commitment to equality. This expanded discussion alsoconsiders the broader socio-political implications of the judgment, offering a nuanced perspective on howreservation policies can adapt to contemporary challenges without losing sight of their historical roots.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15271262
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Equity and Prosperity: A Deep Dive into the Supreme Court's 2024 Decision on SC/ST Reservation Policies

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
article

Navigating Equity and Prosperity: A Deep Dive into the Supreme Court's 2024 Decision on SC/ST Reservation Policies

article en

Abstract

The Supreme Court of India’s 2024 decision to extend the creamy layer exclusion to ScheduledCastes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) has sparked a profound reevaluation of affirmative action’spurpose in the Indian context. This paper offers a detailed critique of the ruling, exploring whethereconomic advancement should serve as a yardstick for determining eligibility for caste-based reservations.It argues that by emphasizing economic criteria, the Court risks undermining the foundational goal ofaffirmative action: the eradication of systemic caste-based exclusion. Drawing on landmark judgmentssuch as Indra Sawhney v. Union of India and E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh, this analysishighlights the tensions between economic upliftment and social justice, suggesting that the 2024 rulingintroduces inconsistencies into the legal framework governing reservations. The paper advocates acomprehensive approach that integrates both social and economic dimensions while preserving thetransformative ethos of India’s constitutional commitment to equality. This expanded discussion alsoconsiders the broader socio-political implications of the judgment, offering a nuanced perspective on howreservation policies can adapt to contemporary challenges without losing sight of their historical roots.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.