A Comparative Look at the Problem of Evil in the Specificity of Ibn Arabi and Mevlâna

The question of the origin of good and evil has been a recurring debate throughout the history of thought. In Abrahamic religions, good is always associated with God, while evil is not associated with God. So while good is recognized by consensus, evil becomes a problem. The concepts of good and evil, which are central to the philosophy of religion, have been debated throughout history, regardless of whether one believes in God or not, and they continue to be debated. The aim of our literature review is to examine how evil, which has been debated in various fields and has become a philosophical problem, is viewed from a comparative perspective by two key figures in Sufism: Ibn al-Arabi and Rumi. The study consists of an introduction and three main sections. The introduction gives a general overview of the concepts of good and evil and the problem of evil. The first section presents Ibn al-Arabi’s views, while the second section focuses on Rumi’s perspectives. The final section concludes the discussion and locates the problem of evil in the realm of Sufism on the basis of these perspectives. This study can be seen as an attempt to evaluate the views of two important figures who have profoundly shaped Sufism on a topic that is highly debated in the field. Indeed, the discourses of these figures concerning their search for truth have reached today’s intellectual world, offering solutions and foundations for the problem from their own perspectives.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15750690
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Look at the Problem of Evil in the Specificity of Ibn Arabi and Mevlâna

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

A Comparative Look at the Problem of Evil in the Specificity of Ibn Arabi and Mevlâna

article en

Abstract

The question of the origin of good and evil has been a recurring debate throughout the history of thought. In Abrahamic religions, good is always associated with God, while evil is not associated with God. So while good is recognized by consensus, evil becomes a problem. The concepts of good and evil, which are central to the philosophy of religion, have been debated throughout history, regardless of whether one believes in God or not, and they continue to be debated. The aim of our literature review is to examine how evil, which has been debated in various fields and has become a philosophical problem, is viewed from a comparative perspective by two key figures in Sufism: Ibn al-Arabi and Rumi. The study consists of an introduction and three main sections. The introduction gives a general overview of the concepts of good and evil and the problem of evil. The first section presents Ibn al-Arabi’s views, while the second section focuses on Rumi’s perspectives. The final section concludes the discussion and locates the problem of evil in the realm of Sufism on the basis of these perspectives. This study can be seen as an attempt to evaluate the views of two important figures who have profoundly shaped Sufism on a topic that is highly debated in the field. Indeed, the discourses of these figures concerning their search for truth have reached today’s intellectual world, offering solutions and foundations for the problem from their own perspectives.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.