Triangular OverConorm with MCDM Methodology for Association Between Speaking Proficiency and Self-Assurance in English Language and Literature

A multifaceted assessment methodology for English language and literature courses in postsecondary educational institutions is presented in this study. The model incorporates qualitative and quantitative indicators across six fundamental criteria—Curriculum Design, Instructional Quality, Student Engagement, Research Output, Cultural Integration, and Language Proficiency Development—in recognition of the variety of educational techniques. These criteria are used to evaluate the efficacy of 18 options that reflect different departments, instructional approaches, or institutions. The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology is used to deal with different criteria and alternatives. This study uses the COPRAS methodology to rank the alternatives. The triangular OverConorm is used in this study to deal with interval values of each criterion and alternatives. The sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the ranks of alternatives under different cases. We proposed six cases in weights criteria. The results contribute to the continuous improvement of the quality of humanities education by illuminating important program strengths and areas for improvement.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15243863
Primary Topic
Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Triangular OverConorm with MCDM Methodology for Association Between Speaking Proficiency and Self-Assurance in English Language and Literature

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Educational Technology and Pedagogy
article

Triangular OverConorm with MCDM Methodology for Association Between Speaking Proficiency and Self-Assurance in English Language and Literature

article en

Abstract

A multifaceted assessment methodology for English language and literature courses in postsecondary educational institutions is presented in this study. The model incorporates qualitative and quantitative indicators across six fundamental criteria—Curriculum Design, Instructional Quality, Student Engagement, Research Output, Cultural Integration, and Language Proficiency Development—in recognition of the variety of educational techniques. These criteria are used to evaluate the efficacy of 18 options that reflect different departments, instructional approaches, or institutions. The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology is used to deal with different criteria and alternatives. This study uses the COPRAS methodology to rank the alternatives. The triangular OverConorm is used in this study to deal with interval values of each criterion and alternatives. The sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the ranks of alternatives under different cases. We proposed six cases in weights criteria. The results contribute to the continuous improvement of the quality of humanities education by illuminating important program strengths and areas for improvement.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Educational Technology and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Triangular OverConorm with MCDM Methodology for Association Between Speaking Proficiency and Self-Assurance in English Language and Literature · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS