IAM_COMPACT_D3.5_Model_interlinkages_and_integration_Update

Over the years, energy-system models (ESMs) and integrated assessment models (IAMs) have become indispensable for evaluating our progress toward climate targets, crafting pathways that align with specific goals, and judging the impact of various mitigation strategies. As the urgency of the climate crisis has grown, so too has the need to encompass a broader range of sectors and the interactions between them. However, expanding a model’s boundaries often adds layers of complexity. To address this without overwhelming individual models, researchers frequently link established models together, allowing cross-system dynamics to emerge organically through those connections. Connecting models not only broadens the analytical scope but also deepens detail in particular sectors while preserving the overall systemic context. Despite its widespread use, model linking presents numerous challenges—arising from differing assumptions, structures, data formats, and temporal or spatial scales—that are seldom explored in depth within published studies. In this deliverable, we first discuss four key problems that are central to most model linking activities, then develop a general “checklist” to be used when considering model linking. We finally demonstrate the use of the checklist for a study carried out in the IAM COMPACT project.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15594045
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IAM_COMPACT_D3.5_Model_interlinkages_and_integration_Update

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

IAM_COMPACT_D3.5_Model_interlinkages_and_integration_Update

article en

Abstract

Over the years, energy-system models (ESMs) and integrated assessment models (IAMs) have become indispensable for evaluating our progress toward climate targets, crafting pathways that align with specific goals, and judging the impact of various mitigation strategies. As the urgency of the climate crisis has grown, so too has the need to encompass a broader range of sectors and the interactions between them. However, expanding a model’s boundaries often adds layers of complexity. To address this without overwhelming individual models, researchers frequently link established models together, allowing cross-system dynamics to emerge organically through those connections. Connecting models not only broadens the analytical scope but also deepens detail in particular sectors while preserving the overall systemic context. Despite its widespread use, model linking presents numerous challenges—arising from differing assumptions, structures, data formats, and temporal or spatial scales—that are seldom explored in depth within published studies. In this deliverable, we first discuss four key problems that are central to most model linking activities, then develop a general “checklist” to be used when considering model linking. We finally demonstrate the use of the checklist for a study carried out in the IAM COMPACT project.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), National Technical University of Athens (GR), Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy (DE), Basque Centre for Climate Change (ES), CICERO Center for International Climate Research (NO), Hospital de Sabadell (ES), Central Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute (US), Imperial College London (GB), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE), Politecnico di Milano (IT), Aalto University (FI)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.