Phanerotomella aurantisoma He & Achterberg & He & Tang & Chen 2025, sp. nov.

Phanerotomella aurantisoma sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 30DC84E0-0358-4AA5-8128-A988A19A372B Figs 9–10 Diagnosis Propodeum with pair of small tubercles latero-posteriorly (Fig. 10I); vein 1-SR+M slightly concave (Fig. 10G); vein r 1.3 × as long as vein r-m (Fig. 10G); mandible slender and inner tooth of mandible reduced, 0.4× apical tooth (Fig. 10D); length of fore wing 4.6 mm (Fig. 10G); scutellum largely punctate except basal reticulation and shiny (Fig. 10H); temple punctate and shiny (Fig. 10C); hind tarsus dark brown (Fig. 10F). Etymology Named after the orange mesosoma; ‘ aurantium ’ is Latin for ‘orange’ and ‘soma’ is Greek for ‘body’. Type material Holotype CHINA – Guangdong • ♀; Huizhou, Xiangtou Mt.; 11 Mar. 2004; Z.F. Xu leg.; ZJUH No. 20048095. Paratypes (2 ♀♀) CHINA – Guangxi • 1 ♀; Daming Mt., Chaoyanggou; 10 Aug. 2011; H. Dong leg.; ZJUH No. 201100511. – Fujian • 1 ♀; Jiangle, Longqi Mt.; 1 Jul. 1991; C.M. Liu leg.; ZJUH No. 969636. Description Female MEASUREMENTS. Length of body 5.1 mm, fore wing 4.6 mm. COLOURATION. Head and metasoma black, mesosoma orange brown; metasoma ventrally white or ivory; antenna black except 3 rd –5 th segments white; mandible basal half dark brown and apical half yellowish and with reddish teeth; fore and middle legs black except coxa, trochanter, basally femur and tibia white; hind leg black except base of coxa, trochanter, base of femur and of tibia white; pterostigma brown, parastigma and wing veins pale brown. HEAD (Fig. 10A–C). Width 1.3 × median length in anterior view (Fig. 10B) and part of head above eye in lateral view 0.3× height of eye (Fig. 10C); antenna with 52 segments and 1.7× as long as fore wing, not widened but shortened medially, gradually narrowing apically, subapical segments non-moniliform and longer than wide, third, fourth, tenth, fifteenth and penultimate segments 4.0, 3.8, 1.6, 1.3 and 1.8× as long as wide in lateral view, respectively (Fig. 10K–L); area of stemmaticum transversely striate; OOL: OD: POL= 36: 13:11; length of eye 1.0× temple in dorsal view (Fig. 10A); frons transversely rugulose and with median carina; vertex rugulose-reticulate with short setae; temple densely punctate and shiny; face densely punctate-rugulose and with distinct median ridge, dorsally connected to median carina; clypeus finely and superficially punctate and with shiny interspaces, truncate medio-ventrally; eye width in lateral view 0.8× maximum width of temple (Fig. 10C), eye height in anterior view 0.7× minimum width of face (Fig. 10B); malar space rugulose and 1.1× as long as basal width of mandible; mandible rather slender, lower tooth of mandible 0.4× as long as apical tooth (Fig. 10D); face width 0.9× height of face and clypeus together. MESOSOMA (Fig. 10H–I). Length 1.5 × its width in lateral view (Fig. 10I); side of pronotum rugulose except for finely punctation; mesoscutum regularly and densely reticulate; notauli absent; scutellar sulcus with five short crenulae (Fig. 10H); scutellum largely finely punctate except basally reticulate; mesopleuron densely and regularly reticulate without smooth and shiny area posteriorly, with weak and incomplete precoxal sulcus basally; propodeum reticulate, without median carina, with irregular transverse carina connected to four weak and blunt lateral tubercles. WINGS (Fig. 10G). Fore wing 3.2× as long as its maximum width; second submarginal cell sessile; vein m-cu distinctly postfurcal; veins r and SR1 straight; vein 1-SR+M slightly concave; length of 1-R1 1.2 × pterostigma; vein r issued far beyond middle of pterostigma, 1.5 × vein r-m; r: 2-SR: SR1 =17: 42: 79; vein 1-CU1 0.3× as long as vein 2-CU1. Hind wing: M+CU:1-M:1r-m =30: 50:17. LEGS (Fig. 10F). Hind femur 4.4 × as long as wide; longest spur of hind tibia 0.4 × its basitarsus; hind leg smooth and shiny except fine and superficial punctation; hind tibia slender; middle tibia without ivory blister. METASOMA (Fig. 10E, J). Oval in dorsal view (Fig. 10J), carapace 1.7 × as long as wide and as long as mesosoma; first to third tergites densely reticulate-rugose; third tergite 1.0× as long as second tergite, medial length of third tergite 0.5× its maximum width; lamella of third tergite not protruding medio-apically and with pair of medium-sized and blunt tubercles latero-apically (Fig. 10E). VARIATION. Length of fore wing of female 4.0– 4.6 mm. Male Unknown. Host Unknown. Distribution China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi). Remarks Phanerotomella aurantisoma sp. nov. is similar to P. digitata sp. nov. because of its having the antenna with a white band on 3 rd –5 th segments, mesosoma orange-brown and eye in dorsal view as long as temple. However, Phanerotomella aurantisoma can be distinguished from P. digitata by having the propodeum with a pair of small and blunt tubercles latero-posteriorly (distinctly larger and finger-shaped tubercles in the latter), a punctate and shiny scutellum (reticulate and matt in the latter), a punctate and shiny temple and face (rugulose and matt in the latter), a comparatively slender mandible and the inner tooth 0.4× as long as apical tooth (more robust and 0.5× in the latter).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16263240
Primary Topic
Libraries and Information Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phanerotomella aurantisoma He & Achterberg & He & Tang & Chen 2025, sp. nov.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Libraries and Information Services
article

Phanerotomella aurantisoma He & Achterberg & He & Tang & Chen 2025, sp. nov.

article en

Abstract

Phanerotomella aurantisoma sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 30DC84E0-0358-4AA5-8128-A988A19A372B Figs 9–10 Diagnosis Propodeum with pair of small tubercles latero-posteriorly (Fig. 10I); vein 1-SR+M slightly concave (Fig. 10G); vein r 1.3 × as long as vein r-m (Fig. 10G); mandible slender and inner tooth of mandible reduced, 0.4× apical tooth (Fig. 10D); length of fore wing 4.6 mm (Fig. 10G); scutellum largely punctate except basal reticulation and shiny (Fig. 10H); temple punctate and shiny (Fig. 10C); hind tarsus dark brown (Fig. 10F). Etymology Named after the orange mesosoma; ‘ aurantium ’ is Latin for ‘orange’ and ‘soma’ is Greek for ‘body’. Type material Holotype CHINA – Guangdong • ♀; Huizhou, Xiangtou Mt.; 11 Mar. 2004; Z.F. Xu leg.; ZJUH No. 20048095. Paratypes (2 ♀♀) CHINA – Guangxi • 1 ♀; Daming Mt., Chaoyanggou; 10 Aug. 2011; H. Dong leg.; ZJUH No. 201100511. – Fujian • 1 ♀; Jiangle, Longqi Mt.; 1 Jul. 1991; C.M. Liu leg.; ZJUH No. 969636. Description Female MEASUREMENTS. Length of body 5.1 mm, fore wing 4.6 mm. COLOURATION. Head and metasoma black, mesosoma orange brown; metasoma ventrally white or ivory; antenna black except 3 rd –5 th segments white; mandible basal half dark brown and apical half yellowish and with reddish teeth; fore and middle legs black except coxa, trochanter, basally femur and tibia white; hind leg black except base of coxa, trochanter, base of femur and of tibia white; pterostigma brown, parastigma and wing veins pale brown. HEAD (Fig. 10A–C). Width 1.3 × median length in anterior view (Fig. 10B) and part of head above eye in lateral view 0.3× height of eye (Fig. 10C); antenna with 52 segments and 1.7× as long as fore wing, not widened but shortened medially, gradually narrowing apically, subapical segments non-moniliform and longer than wide, third, fourth, tenth, fifteenth and penultimate segments 4.0, 3.8, 1.6, 1.3 and 1.8× as long as wide in lateral view, respectively (Fig. 10K–L); area of stemmaticum transversely striate; OOL: OD: POL= 36: 13:11; length of eye 1.0× temple in dorsal view (Fig. 10A); frons transversely rugulose and with median carina; vertex rugulose-reticulate with short setae; temple densely punctate and shiny; face densely punctate-rugulose and with distinct median ridge, dorsally connected to median carina; clypeus finely and superficially punctate and with shiny interspaces, truncate medio-ventrally; eye width in lateral view 0.8× maximum width of temple (Fig. 10C), eye height in anterior view 0.7× minimum width of face (Fig. 10B); malar space rugulose and 1.1× as long as basal width of mandible; mandible rather slender, lower tooth of mandible 0.4× as long as apical tooth (Fig. 10D); face width 0.9× height of face and clypeus together. MESOSOMA (Fig. 10H–I). Length 1.5 × its width in lateral view (Fig. 10I); side of pronotum rugulose except for finely punctation; mesoscutum regularly and densely reticulate; notauli absent; scutellar sulcus with five short crenulae (Fig. 10H); scutellum largely finely punctate except basally reticulate; mesopleuron densely and regularly reticulate without smooth and shiny area posteriorly, with weak and incomplete precoxal sulcus basally; propodeum reticulate, without median carina, with irregular transverse carina connected to four weak and blunt lateral tubercles. WINGS (Fig. 10G). Fore wing 3.2× as long as its maximum width; second submarginal cell sessile; vein m-cu distinctly postfurcal; veins r and SR1 straight; vein 1-SR+M slightly concave; length of 1-R1 1.2 × pterostigma; vein r issued far beyond middle of pterostigma, 1.5 × vein r-m; r: 2-SR: SR1 =17: 42: 79; vein 1-CU1 0.3× as long as vein 2-CU1. Hind wing: M+CU:1-M:1r-m =30: 50:17. LEGS (Fig. 10F). Hind femur 4.4 × as long as wide; longest spur of hind tibia 0.4 × its basitarsus; hind leg smooth and shiny except fine and superficial punctation; hind tibia slender; middle tibia without ivory blister. METASOMA (Fig. 10E, J). Oval in dorsal view (Fig. 10J), carapace 1.7 × as long as wide and as long as mesosoma; first to third tergites densely reticulate-rugose; third tergite 1.0× as long as second tergite, medial length of third tergite 0.5× its maximum width; lamella of third tergite not protruding medio-apically and with pair of medium-sized and blunt tubercles latero-apically (Fig. 10E). VARIATION. Length of fore wing of female 4.0– 4.6 mm. Male Unknown. Host Unknown. Distribution China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi). Remarks Phanerotomella aurantisoma sp. nov. is similar to P. digitata sp. nov. because of its having the antenna with a white band on 3 rd –5 th segments, mesosoma orange-brown and eye in dorsal view as long as temple. However, Phanerotomella aurantisoma can be distinguished from P. digitata by having the propodeum with a pair of small and blunt tubercles latero-posteriorly (distinctly larger and finger-shaped tubercles in the latter), a punctate and shiny scutellum (reticulate and matt in the latter), a punctate and shiny temple and face (rugulose and matt in the latter), a comparatively slender mandible and the inner tooth 0.4× as long as apical tooth (more robust and 0.5× in the latter).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Libraries and Information Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.