"COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MACHINE VS. HUMAN TRANSLATION OF TOURISM BROCHURES IN UZBEK-ENGLISH CONTEXT"

This study presents a comparative analysis of machine and human translation of tourism brochures in the Uzbek-English language pair. Using a corpus of official tourism materials, the research evaluates the accuracy, cultural appropriateness, stylistic coherence, and pragmatic functionality of both translation approaches. Drawing on theories from translation studies—particularly functionalist and communicative models—the paper reveals that while machine translation offers speed and basic lexical equivalence, it frequently fails in maintaining cultural nuance, idiomatic expression, and register sensitivity. In contrast, human translators demonstrate greater flexibility in localizing content, adapting metaphors, and aligning with target audience expectations. The study employs error analysis and expert evaluation to categorize common issues and strengths in both methods. The findings underscore the importance of human involvement in translating tourism discourse and suggest a hybrid approach that combines the efficiency of machine translation with the cultural and contextual depth provided by human translators.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16760525
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MACHINE VS. HUMAN TRANSLATION OF TOURISM BROCHURES IN UZBEK-ENGLISH CONTEXT"

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Translation Studies and Practices
article

"COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MACHINE VS. HUMAN TRANSLATION OF TOURISM BROCHURES IN UZBEK-ENGLISH CONTEXT"

article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of machine and human translation of tourism brochures in the Uzbek-English language pair. Using a corpus of official tourism materials, the research evaluates the accuracy, cultural appropriateness, stylistic coherence, and pragmatic functionality of both translation approaches. Drawing on theories from translation studies—particularly functionalist and communicative models—the paper reveals that while machine translation offers speed and basic lexical equivalence, it frequently fails in maintaining cultural nuance, idiomatic expression, and register sensitivity. In contrast, human translators demonstrate greater flexibility in localizing content, adapting metaphors, and aligning with target audience expectations. The study employs error analysis and expert evaluation to categorize common issues and strengths in both methods. The findings underscore the importance of human involvement in translating tourism discourse and suggest a hybrid approach that combines the efficiency of machine translation with the cultural and contextual depth provided by human translators.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

"COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MACHINE VS. HUMAN TRANSLATION OF TOURISM BROCHURES IN UZBEK-ENGLISH CONTEXT" · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS