The Concept of Punishment against Perpetrators of Narcotics Offenses in Article 111 Paragraph (1) And Article 112 Paragraph (2) Of the Narcotics Law

This study aims to determine the legal consequences of decisions on narcotics criminal cases that deviate from the provisions of the general minimum special criminal law based on sufficient consideration by the Panel of Judges and the ideal concept of the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 3 of 2015 concerning the Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the Supreme Court Chamber Plenary Meeting in 2015 as a Guideline for the Implementation of Duties for the Court in narcotics criminal cases class I. The type of research in this study is normative juridical supported by interviews with informants. The results of the study in this discussion are that the legal consequences of a narcotics criminal case decision deviating from the provisions of the special minimum general criminal law based on sufficient consideration by the Panel of Judges are decisions that are contrary to the principle of legality and cause disparities in judges' decisions for other cases that are identical to legal facts and conflicts of interest between the Public Prosecutor and the Panel of Judges in the trial.