Capturing IMF variations in observations and simulations - how far along are we?

For any given population of stars, the initial mass function lies at the heart of converting mass into light and vice versa. For example, observers use the IMF to derive physical properties from the observed light of galaxies. On the other hand, hydrodynamical, cosmological simulations require an IMF shape for their sub-grid physics, which ultimately dictates the stellar mass of simulated galaxy. However, galaxies in a LCDM cosmology undergo a multifaceted assembly process, which not only emerges due to the complexity of the baryonic cycle, but also their individual merger history. To fully understand galaxy formation, we need to take into account all these complexities from hierarchical assembly, to bursty star formation histories and chemical evolution of individual elements until the variability of the IMF. I will talk about the state-of-the-art of tools that begin to allow us to capture these complexities and how they shape and alter our view of galaxy formation. In particular, I will focus on newest results of the IMF variation in the connection with the abundance of alpha-elements.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14901963
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capturing IMF variations in observations and simulations - how far along are we?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Capturing IMF variations in observations and simulations - how far along are we?

article en

Abstract

For any given population of stars, the initial mass function lies at the heart of converting mass into light and vice versa. For example, observers use the IMF to derive physical properties from the observed light of galaxies. On the other hand, hydrodynamical, cosmological simulations require an IMF shape for their sub-grid physics, which ultimately dictates the stellar mass of simulated galaxy. However, galaxies in a LCDM cosmology undergo a multifaceted assembly process, which not only emerges due to the complexity of the baryonic cycle, but also their individual merger history. To fully understand galaxy formation, we need to take into account all these complexities from hierarchical assembly, to bursty star formation histories and chemical evolution of individual elements until the variability of the IMF. I will talk about the state-of-the-art of tools that begin to allow us to capture these complexities and how they shape and alter our view of galaxy formation. In particular, I will focus on newest results of the IMF variation in the connection with the abundance of alpha-elements.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.