Explainable AI through the lens of Legitimate AI

Explainable AI (XAI) is frequently linked to responsible AI, under the assumption that it allows organisations to implement AI responsibly. However, with AI's growing use in civic settings, the number of people subjected to (partially) automated decisions rises, which should make us question if explanations from a responsible AI perspective would also benefit these subjects. We propose legitimate AI as an alternative and more relevant perspective to guide explainable AI (XAI) research focused on these subjects. If subjects are aided in their judgement of whether an AI is legitimate, they can serve as a societal check if the development and usage of an AI were done responsibly. In addition, explanations supporting that judgment enable them to decide to contest or accept a decision. We outline four aspects of legitimacy and their relevance to XAI, discussing a subject's potential questions for each aspect, highlighting topics that are currently under-explored. This perspective also uncovers the complexity of explanations aimed at empowering subjects, as such explanations need to reveal complex and intertwined topics through limited to no direct interaction.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15170256
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable AI through the lens of Legitimate AI

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Explainable AI through the lens of Legitimate AI

article en

Abstract

Explainable AI (XAI) is frequently linked to responsible AI, under the assumption that it allows organisations to implement AI responsibly. However, with AI's growing use in civic settings, the number of people subjected to (partially) automated decisions rises, which should make us question if explanations from a responsible AI perspective would also benefit these subjects. We propose legitimate AI as an alternative and more relevant perspective to guide explainable AI (XAI) research focused on these subjects. If subjects are aided in their judgement of whether an AI is legitimate, they can serve as a societal check if the development and usage of an AI were done responsibly. In addition, explanations supporting that judgment enable them to decide to contest or accept a decision. We outline four aspects of legitimacy and their relevance to XAI, discussing a subject's potential questions for each aspect, highlighting topics that are currently under-explored. This perspective also uncovers the complexity of explanations aimed at empowering subjects, as such explanations need to reveal complex and intertwined topics through limited to no direct interaction.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Explainable AI through the lens of Legitimate AI · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS