Modeling in history: using LLMs to automatically produce diagrammatic models synthesizing Piketty's historiographical thesis on economic inequalities

This study seeks to merge two realms: theoretical digital history, specifically the modeling in history, and economic history, with a focus on the history of income and wealth inequalities. The central objective is to apply theoretical research outcomes concerning models and their application in history to scrutinize a historical explanation of the evolution of economic inequalities between 1914 and 1950. Traditionally, predictive models with reproducible results were paramount for validating explanations through observed data. However, the role of models has expanded, moving beyond mere predictive functions. This paradigm shift, acknowledged by the philosophy of science in recent decades, emphasizes that models now serve broader purposes, guiding exploration and research rather than just prediction. These models are not merely tools for validating predictions; they serve to bring clarity to our thinking processes, establishing the conditions under which our intuitions prove valid. Beyond merely representing systematic relationships between predetermined facets of reality, models aspire to elucidate causal connections. When a historical model aims to provide causal explanations, the process involves identifying the “explanandum” (the aspect of reality being explained) as the dependent variable and working backward to pinpoint its hypothetical causes as independent. Using a diagrammatic approach, we formalized a qualitative model aligning with an historiographical explanation of the evolution of economic inequalities by Thomas Piketty during 1914-1950. The intent was to employ causal diagrams, translating the narrative embedded in Piketty’s historiography of inequalities into a formal model. This endeavor sought to make explicit the implicit causal relationships within the historian’s narrative: the resulting causal model serves as a symbolic synthesis of our comprehension of a specific subject, enabling the construction of a highly refined narrative synthesis from a complex topic.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13908109
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling in history: using LLMs to automatically produce diagrammatic models synthesizing Piketty's historiographical thesis on economic inequalities

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Modeling in history: using LLMs to automatically produce diagrammatic models synthesizing Piketty's historiographical thesis on economic inequalities

article en

Abstract

This study seeks to merge two realms: theoretical digital history, specifically the modeling in history, and economic history, with a focus on the history of income and wealth inequalities. The central objective is to apply theoretical research outcomes concerning models and their application in history to scrutinize a historical explanation of the evolution of economic inequalities between 1914 and 1950. Traditionally, predictive models with reproducible results were paramount for validating explanations through observed data. However, the role of models has expanded, moving beyond mere predictive functions. This paradigm shift, acknowledged by the philosophy of science in recent decades, emphasizes that models now serve broader purposes, guiding exploration and research rather than just prediction. These models are not merely tools for validating predictions; they serve to bring clarity to our thinking processes, establishing the conditions under which our intuitions prove valid. Beyond merely representing systematic relationships between predetermined facets of reality, models aspire to elucidate causal connections. When a historical model aims to provide causal explanations, the process involves identifying the “explanandum” (the aspect of reality being explained) as the dependent variable and working backward to pinpoint its hypothetical causes as independent. Using a diagrammatic approach, we formalized a qualitative model aligning with an historiographical explanation of the evolution of economic inequalities by Thomas Piketty during 1914-1950. The intent was to employ causal diagrams, translating the narrative embedded in Piketty’s historiography of inequalities into a formal model. This endeavor sought to make explicit the implicit causal relationships within the historian’s narrative: the resulting causal model serves as a symbolic synthesis of our comprehension of a specific subject, enabling the construction of a highly refined narrative synthesis from a complex topic.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Lausanne (CH)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.